Quote bren2k="bren2k"The fact that the Widnes coach made such a childish outburst after the game hasn't helped how this is perceived; there have been mountains of sour grapes from Widnes fans and Betts about the result, and this just appears to be piling on the misery. And to suggest that Widnes do not benefit from Moore getting a longer ban is nonsense - we're at that point in the season and in relative positions in the table, where any disadvantage to us is an advantage to them. I guess they were so fired up about their good start to the season that they never expected us to be rivals.
Anyhow - if there is evidence that the MRP didn't spot when they previously looked at the incidents from the game in detail - then he deserves a ban;
'"
The beef wasn't with you pal it was with Cobb. It was and still is. I've got no wish to go over that again because we could debate it for the next four hundred years and the two sides simply won't agree on it. It's best to draw a line under it, shake hands and move on.
Quote bren2k if there isn't, Heremaia and Widnes are worthy of scorn - the only thing worse than trying to deliberately injure an opponent, is lying about an injury to get your opponent banned.'"
And this is the problem right here.... As I've mentioned above. Your conclusion is to jump right on the assumption that Heremaia or worse the whole club made it up. If we're both agreed that we need clear evidence to convict then we also need clear evidence of a smear campaign surely.
