Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 67 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2015 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Sep 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I have just been crunching a few numbers from the Opta stat pack. A few things stand out as being quite surprising.
I along with many others have put our woeful displays down to mainly poor tackling, lack of impetus going forward, handling errors and key refereeing decisions going against us.
A look at the figures seems to tell a different story though.
Here is a list comparing a few key metrics with our nearest and dearest rivals, Castleford.
[list
[*Missed Tackles - Wakefield 2 more per game[/*:m
[*Average Gain - Castleford 0.18m more per carry [/*:m
[*Errors - Wakefield 0.5 more per game [/*:m
[*Penalties - Wakefield 1 more per game[/*:m[/list:u
Although they have fared much better than us this season, these figures don’t really tell a significantly different story.
The talk for a long while was that the pack were performing ok but, the backs were letting the side down. I personally think the following figures indicate that the backs were either playing behind a pack that were consistently losing the collision and not dominating the ruck or, there was a lack of football intelligence or sharpness from the pivots.
[list
[*Dummy Half Runs - Castleford 6 more per game[/*:m
[*Attacking Kicks - Castleford 5 more per game[/*:m[/list:u
I know only too well that you can skew statistics to try and prove a point but, I’m not trying to prove a point at all really. Just trying to take a more analytical look at things rather than just the gut (wrenching) feeling of having watched the games.
The things that I thought were our main problems, don’t seem on the face of it to be indicated by the facts.
(All stats ©Opta)
|