The point of the Leeds game is really just a tune up game and to see how the things they are working on in pre season work on the field against real opposition.



With that in mind I wouldn't play anyone at prop from the first 17+ who are likely to feature in the early part of the season. Agar will want to play them in their real position to see how they go.

I'd play the two start up props as long for as they can stand and play a kid in the later stages who actually plays prop. It won't be a terrible game for them to start and Leeds will be doing the same.

I reckon Poore and Raleigh will appreciate the extra minutes anyway

Quote ="newgroundb4cas"Get off your high horse. Trout didn't impress me last year, not 1 game. Walshaw however did and is far too slow to be a centre Agar used him at 2nd row towards the back end of the season. You know and most people on here do I am correct 99.9 % of the time. Just dont accept cos i am not the in ">crowd.'" Ah yes, I remember the 0.01%, when you blamed Washbrook for single handily losing us the play-off game.

Quote ="newgroundb4cas"Get off your high horse. Trout didn't impress me last year, not 1 game. Walshaw however did and is far too slow to be a centre Agar used him at 2nd row towards the back end of the season. You know and most people on here do I am correct 99.9 % of the time. Just dont accept cos i am not the in ">crowd.'" Ah yes, I remember the 0.01%, when you blamed Washbrook for single handily losing us the play-off game.

Poore maybe but Raleigh was doing the most minutes for the forwards last year. I'm sure he'd appreciate the rest!

The main point of the Leeds game is a decent off season pay day.

Forgot how mental these threads can get icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> Thumb injury Olly? big soft get!

Forgot how mental these threads can get icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> Thumb injury Olly? big soft get!