| |
Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us.
If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
 |
| 
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 24 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
How far are we a long compared to Castleford and Salford, who currently seem to be our major rivals for the drop? This is mainly what I’ve heard from certain people but I’m not too sure about some of this and if anyone could share any information and help clarify/confirm our situation in relation to the other clubs it would be appreciated.
Us - Just got the basic planning permission, however due to the wait we have had, seem to have sorted out any future problems. Also it’s now in the hands of the regional government, who want this kind of development. Plus we have funding for our stadium. This is all good and short of discovering a Roman temple under Newmarket should get the go ahead.
Castleford – Also have basic planning permission but still haven’t applied for detailed, although I’d expect that to change around Monday or Tuesday. Funding the project seems like a problem with a large chunk of money coming from the sale of the old ground. However surely since 2006, which was when the ground was priced, or so I’ve been told, the value of the land must have dropped. On top of that could the buyer not decide to move to the factory site instead of the ground if the ban on building has been removed?
Salford – Have planning permission and seem ahead at the minute however, there seems to be some problems with funding, haven’t heard a lot about Salford.
Also I’d like to point out I hope that the League is expanded instead of a team being dropped.
If this is the wrong place to post then sorry, but it seemed like a logical place for this type of post.
I'd also like to add my thanks to the people who made this happen.
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 5837 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote FIL="FIL""8.14 Finally, para 8.3 of the Site Allocations document identifies that Wakefield’s economy
is inextricably linked with that of the wider Leeds City region and needs to take full
advantage of opportunities presented by the continued growth of the Leeds
economy. Aire Valley Leeds a 1,000 hectare site to the south of Leeds is the most
significant employment opportunity within the Leeds City region. This represents a
more appropriate location for large scale warehousing and freight distribution linked
to an urban eco settlement if a more appropriate site cannot be found within
Wakefield district.
8.15 In addition, there are employment sites in Leeds District has the following sites which
are available now or in the short term where plots of this size could be offered, as
follows:
LOCATION SITE
AREA
S/O SKELTON GRANGE PWR STN LS9 26.70
BELL WOOD SITE (E4:9) OFF
PONTEFRACT LANE LS9
59.92
B2/B8 ELEMENT SKELTON MOOR FARM
PONTEFRACT LANE LS9
33.06
Ph2 HAWKS PARK NORTH NEWHOLD
ABERFORD ROAD GARFORTH
16.80
Ph1 WAREHOUSE HAWKS PARK NORTH
NEWHOLD ABERFORD ROAD
GARFORTH
7.25
8.16 If sites of 5 ha plus are considered, which could offer c 20000 sq.m. (220k sq.ft.)
this adds in two more
HUB62 BRUNTCLIFFE ROAD MORLEY
LS27
5.94
Page 60
SANDBECK LANE WETHERBY LS22 6.28
Therefore, it comes down to four sites that would be impacted by the proposed
scheme. Of these, it would be the Bellwood, Skelton Moor and Skelton Grange sites
that feature most prominently in Leeds’ regeneration ambitions in AVL."
So once you have cut through the bullsh*t, they want the jobs and warehouses for themselves....
'"
I know ,it's sort of counter productive and looks like they are objecting because they have some warehouse space to shift. Their arrogance knows no bounds. | | | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 8962 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2022 | Jun 2021 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote FIL="FIL""8.14 Finally, para 8.3 of the Site Allocations document identifies that Wakefield’s economy
is inextricably linked with that of the wider Leeds City region and needs to take full
advantage of opportunities presented by the continued growth of the Leeds
economy. Aire Valley Leeds a 1,000 hectare site to the south of Leeds is the most
significant employment opportunity within the Leeds City region. This represents a
more appropriate location for large scale warehousing and freight distribution linked
to an urban eco settlement if a more appropriate site cannot be found within
Wakefield district.
8.15 In addition, there are employment sites in Leeds District has the following sites which
are available now or in the short term where plots of this size could be offered, as
follows:
LOCATION SITE
AREA
S/O SKELTON GRANGE PWR STN LS9 26.70
BELL WOOD SITE (E4:9) OFF
PONTEFRACT LANE LS9
59.92
B2/B8 ELEMENT SKELTON MOOR FARM
PONTEFRACT LANE LS9
33.06
Ph2 HAWKS PARK NORTH NEWHOLD
ABERFORD ROAD GARFORTH
16.80
Ph1 WAREHOUSE HAWKS PARK NORTH
NEWHOLD ABERFORD ROAD
GARFORTH
7.25
8.16 If sites of 5 ha plus are considered, which could offer c 20000 sq.m. (220k sq.ft.)
this adds in two more
HUB62 BRUNTCLIFFE ROAD MORLEY
LS27
5.94
Page 60
SANDBECK LANE WETHERBY LS22 6.28
Therefore, it comes down to four sites that would be impacted by the proposed
scheme. Of these, it would be the Bellwood, Skelton Moor and Skelton Grange sites
that feature most prominently in Leeds’ regeneration ambitions in AVL."
So once you have cut through the bullsh*t, they want the jobs and warehouses for themselves....
'"
Unbelievable!!! Leeds council "Wakefield cant have all these new warehouses and jobs, we need them and we are bigger than Wakefield!!! jeez they really are incredible! They make the NIMBY's look unselfish!! | | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 15521 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
It's nice to see LCC's frothing outrage; for once, WMDC are refusing to act like vassals and clearly, they don't like it up 'em.
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 25 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2011 | May 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
That really is taking the proverbial. LCC = Uber-NIMBY's.
| | | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 14302 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2018 | Sep 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Shameless="Shameless"That really is taking the proverbial. LCC = Uber-NIMBY's.'" It would seem so.
The problem is that they may bend more ears that 3 people and their 1000 letters. | | | |
| |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
| POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
|---|
| 19.67M | 1,258 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
|
|
