Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
Why do i get the impression that you are trying to provoke an argument with me when I am clearly on your side. I did read your post very carefully - please return the favour.
We can spend all day arguing over what words mean. As I have said there is NOTHING in your original post which I disagree with. Why are you being pedantic about whether or not you can pass or fail a CRB check. Most people are aware of the need and scope of CRB checks and they understand the terms "pass" and "fail". It's an everyday term. As far as everyone else on here is concerned - you failed to pass a CRB check.
My question, in your favour, asks "why wasn't the correct procedure followed when you were appointed". If there was a "potential" problem with your credentials, should this have not been picked up much earlier. What you are saying (and I am casting no aspersions here) is that you were allowed to practice physiotherapy on young men without any background checks being made.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
