I am only offering an opinion as to why I think agreement may not have have been reached. You don't have to agree with it but neither is there need for a condescending tone to any response. I am well aware that Bateman's deal begins next year. It is not beyond the realms of possibility for someone facing a wage cut to take the view that money being allocated to spend next year could be being taken at least in part from savings being made now by effecting said cuts.



Even a small percentage share in the costs of buying a football club is going to be a damn site more expensive than something like a sofa. I was only putting forward an opinion that those facing wage cuts (who don't seem to be happy enough to agree to whatever terms were offered as yet) may view such considerations of expenditure from the club owner as more relevant to their situation than you do.



Do either of you have any thoughts as to reasons why our club do not seem to have settled the issue?

If Leeds had gone there when they should have instead of pretending that they had covid symptoms then they wouldn’t have to go now.

Quote ="JonnyBroad"If Leeds had gone there when they should have instead of pretending that they had covid symptoms then they wouldn’t have to go ">now.'" Great conspiracy theory seeing how Joe Greenwood was the player in question

Quote ="JonnyBroad"If Leeds had gone there when they should have instead of pretending that they had covid symptoms then they wouldn’t have to go ">now.'" Great conspiracy theory seeing how Joe Greenwood was the player in question

Not a conspiracy theory, its a fact. Leeds should have been punished for refusing to play and used a loan player as a scape goat.

Quote ="JonnyBroad"Not a conspiracy theory, its a fact. Leeds should have been punished for refusing to play and used a loan player as a scape ">goat.'" I have inside knowledge of this one. The return flights were cancelled and Spain (where the flights go from and to) went into a state of emergency by the time the game should have been played. The game should have been canned and Leeds did the right thing. I'll wager they stopped a lot of people getting COVID by forcing the cancellation of the game.

Quote ="JonnyBroad"Not a conspiracy theory, its a fact. Leeds should have been punished for refusing to play and used a loan player as a scape ">goat.'" I have inside knowledge of this one. The return flights were cancelled and Spain (where the flights go from and to) went into a state of emergency by the time the game should have been played. The game should have been canned and Leeds did the right thing. I'll wager they stopped a lot of people getting COVID by forcing the cancellation of the game.

Quote ="JonnyBroad"Not a conspiracy theory, its a fact. Leeds should have been punished for refusing to play and used a loan player as a scape ">goat.'" The fact is he was showing symptoms similar to those of the virus hence why they didn`t travel. Had his symptoms developed into the virus and they traveled a fair few more might have been infected. The airlines were already shutting down so whilst it was a bold decision it was the right one at the time. Do you really think they had to use a loan player as a scapegoat!? I`m sure Greenwood would have been really pleased to take on that role to save a team he wasn`t even contracted to d040.gif" alt="d040.gif" title="CRAZY" />

Quote ="JonnyBroad"Not a conspiracy theory, its a fact. Leeds should have been punished for refusing to play and used a loan player as a scape ">goat.'" The fact is he was showing symptoms similar to those of the virus hence why they didn`t travel. Had his symptoms developed into the virus and they traveled a fair few more might have been infected. The airlines were already shutting down so whilst it was a bold decision it was the right one at the time. Do you really think they had to use a loan player as a scapegoat!? I`m sure Greenwood would have been really pleased to take on that role to save a team he wasn`t even contracted to d040.gif" alt="d040.gif" title="CRAZY" />