What a strange decision letting an academy player, who has shown promise every time he's been given a chance, go to one of our rivals for pittance. How can he be good enough for the league leaders and CL holders but not for the 8th placed team? 

I’d agree Currie is a far better player, I’d argue that his performances dipped a little after his two ACL’s, which has affected his contract value going forward. For the past 18 months / 2 years he has been excellent.

King fell lucky with his contract, he was at his peak performances and was in high demand. With hindsight it was the wrong decision to give him a contract of that size, but there would have been plenty of people frustrated at the time had we not retained him.



I’d be surprised if he was our 3rd marquee for 2026.

The King contract just shows how poor we have been in recruitment and retention. You wouldn't have seen Wigan signing him during the last 4 years.

He might not be a marquee player next year, we have no idea who will be.

Currie should be our homegrown marquee as he's superb. He was easily man of the match yesterday for me, as said above, he's been brilliant for a few years now and well deserves it

Just realised we should have Walker back in the next 2-4 weeks, ready for the playoffs push, once he's match fit it will add another dimension in attack for us.
We still badly need a forward though, Our forwards did well yesterday but Hull were way off form.
Next werk will be a big test for us, everyones been battering Salford, 58-0 today, i have one of those bad feelings we'll clock off and take it lightly.
Hopefully we won't and can get some good points against them.

They were happy to sign him on loan with us paying a chunk of his wages! 


They kept hold of Wardle though.