Quote ="Fordy"The latest charge is based on the accounts of the touch judge and an opposing player. That same touch judge presumably couldn't even see punches being thrown 2 weeks ago as the evidence against Moore for that offence states "the exact nature and force of the punches cannot be clarified from the DVD". If that was the case why didn't they take the TJ's evidence into account then as surely spotting a punch is easier than spotting an eye gouge through a group of 15-20 players.
If it was reported to the referee at the time why was it not dealt with when the other offences were - given that the TJ clearly saw it!!'"
No you're absolutely right mate. The touch judge despises Wakefield soooooo much and wanted to tarnish a player's reputation that he decided to lie and say that he saw an eye gouge when one absolutely and unequivocally did not happen. What's more the MRP have decided to lie and say that the incident was reported at the time on the night when it obviously wasn't. You've got them bang to rights here mate! Well done you. You should contact the national papers with this.