The two from last week were deemed by the match review panel "that the players landed safely".

Wtf has that got to do with it, the rules are clear that spear / cannonball tackles are illegal, the reckless intent was there just because they landed safely makes it ok???

The mind boggles.

Just seen the clip of the celebrations from yesterday's win. Caton Brown still on crutches from a cannon ball tackle from weeks ago and Brough wasn't even sin binned. Be so unfair if Tomkins is banned.

John Boudebza got a 4 match ban for a far less nasty looking tackle.

Quote GansonTheClown="GansonTheClown"John Boudebza got a 4 match ban for a far less nasty looking ">tackle.'" Yes but he plays for hull kr,so if cited for anything its at least 2 matches. Broughs cannonball tackle was terrible and wasnt banned at all,if that had been boudebza he would have been jailed.

Quote GansonTheClown="GansonTheClown"John Boudebza got a 4 match ban for a far less nasty looking ">tackle.'" Yes but he plays for hull kr,so if cited for anything its at least 2 matches. Broughs cannonball tackle was terrible and wasnt banned at all,if that had been boudebza he would have been jailed.

Quote deslawson="deslawson" Quote deslawson="GansonTheClown"John Boudebza got a 4 match ban for a far less nasty looking ">tackle.'" Yes but he plays for hull kr,so if cited for anything its at least 2 matches. Broughs cannonball tackle was terrible and wasnt banned at all,if that had been boudebza he would have been ">jailed.'" The opinion of other rugby fans seems to be the same, Brough was guilty & until the RFL can show consistency or explain why us ordinary do not see clear transparency in there decision making we will continue to believe in the conspiracy theories. Quote deslawson="DirkDiggler"The two from last week were deemed by the match review panel "that the players landed safely". Wtf has that got to do with it, the rules are clear that spear / cannonball tackles are illegal, the reckless intent was there just because they landed safely makes it ok???'" So using this theory MCB season injury should have been at least a 6 game ban for Brough then? at least they are consistent at being inconsistent d040.gif" alt="d040.gif" title="CRAZY" /> icon_beat.gif" alt="icon_beat.gif" title="BEAT" />

Quote deslawson="deslawson" Quote deslawson="GansonTheClown"John Boudebza got a 4 match ban for a far less nasty looking ">tackle.'" Yes but he plays for hull kr,so if cited for anything its at least 2 matches. Broughs cannonball tackle was terrible and wasnt banned at all,if that had been boudebza he would have been ">jailed.'" The opinion of other rugby fans seems to be the same, Brough was guilty & until the RFL can show consistency or explain why us ordinary do not see clear transparency in there decision making we will continue to believe in the conspiracy theories. Quote deslawson="DirkDiggler"The two from last week were deemed by the match review panel "that the players landed safely". Wtf has that got to do with it, the rules are clear that spear / cannonball tackles are illegal, the reckless intent was there just because they landed safely makes it ok???'" So using this theory MCB season injury should have been at least a 6 game ban for Brough then? at least they are consistent at being inconsistent d040.gif" alt="d040.gif" title="CRAZY" /> icon_beat.gif" alt="icon_beat.gif" title="BEAT" />

Logan Tompkins got a one Week ban after pleading Guilty Mu Lord.

Patrick Ah Van of Widnes got a 5 week ban for his Tackle against Wakefield.