Poor match from both teams,



Both teams were out of there game plan after about 30 mins, 3 GAMES IN 7.8..9 Days is too much on all all teams not just Salford, player welfare has to be thought about.



It is about time 2 games over the Easter weekend was binned, i would rather see 1 game over Easter , then 2 fit teams playing the following week rather than 2 teams just turning up trying to play a game, with players getting injured all over the pitch with fatigue . pulled muscles etc not good for the game and def not good for the player of the team.



In Aus there is a player and team revolt of having to play 2 games within 5 days never mind 3 games in 7plus days it is wrong.



Not good for the fans who pay good money to watch.



As for today's match well done to wakey they came through it better than us.

No issue with Ian Watson at all, done a good job thus far cheaper budget than either Noble or Harris had to work with.



We should have beaten Wakefield on Saturday too. How many opportunities did the players want/need? Difference between the two was Wakefield were clinical with their breaks/chances whereas we squandered them.

Quote ="redgunner" I understand supporters frustrations at both the Catalans & Wakefield results but have you, we should have had at least a point at Wigan & should have beaten Warrington on the ">day.'" Gunner, the Warrington game we turned up for forty minutes, the same against Widnes but we held on just. So the St Helens, Warrington, Wigan, Widnes, and Castleford games were justifiable performances, however, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield were embarrassingly not. Getting beaten I can swallow, but winning and losing in an unethical manner to Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield I struggle to swallow. Players attitudes and desire should never come into question. They're Non-negotiables at most clubs, yet condoned here.

Quote ="redgunner" I understand supporters frustrations at both the Catalans & Wakefield results but have you, we should have had at least a point at Wigan & should have beaten Warrington on the ">day.'" Gunner, the Warrington game we turned up for forty minutes, the same against Widnes but we held on just. So the St Helens, Warrington, Wigan, Widnes, and Castleford games were justifiable performances, however, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield were embarrassingly not. Getting beaten I can swallow, but winning and losing in an unethical manner to Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield I struggle to swallow. Players attitudes and desire should never come into question. They're Non-negotiables at most clubs, yet condoned here.

RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner". Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles icon_wink.gif" alt="icon_wink.gif" title="Wink" /> ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect perfection.

RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner". Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles icon_wink.gif" alt="icon_wink.gif" title="Wink" /> ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect perfection.

Quote ="Hillbilly_Red"RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner". Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles icon_wink.gif" alt="icon_wink.gif" title="Wink" /> ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect ">perfection.'" Quite simple really,Why you so serious. The following performances, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield have lacked moral values attributed in Rugby League terms, making the performances lacking in [umorality [/uin Rugby League terms not in true life form. icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> With regards to expecting perfection, that is simply not the case, unlike you, I expect all the moral values to be met where attitude, aptitude, and desire are [uNOT[/u left wanting collectively which are immoral in Rugby League terms, get with the times HillBilly Red we're not in the 70's anymore where a Woodbine and a pint was the half-time refreshments. Urine and chips come to mind. icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" />

Quote ="Hillbilly_Red"RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner". Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles icon_wink.gif" alt="icon_wink.gif" title="Wink" /> ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect ">perfection.'" Quite simple really,Why you so serious. The following performances, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield have lacked moral values attributed in Rugby League terms, making the performances lacking in [umorality [/uin Rugby League terms not in true life form. icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> With regards to expecting perfection, that is simply not the case, unlike you, I expect all the moral values to be met where attitude, aptitude, and desire are [uNOT[/u left wanting collectively which are immoral in Rugby League terms, get with the times HillBilly Red we're not in the 70's anymore where a Woodbine and a pint was the half-time refreshments. Urine and chips come to mind. icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" />

I am confused by your answer. To me ethics refer to two possibilties: 1 that county where young things are noted for hair lacqer and fake tans 2 how morality is practised: I dare you to state to the players that that they are immoral. As for the distinction between RL and "true life form" , icon_eek.gif" alt="icon_eek.gif" title="Shocked" /> , I must have drank too much before matches and believed that what I saw on the meadow was true to life. Oh well, at least now I can relax knowing it is all an illusion. Benthamite ethics at their best.

I am confused by your answer. To me ethics refer to two possibilties: 1 that county where young things are noted for hair lacqer and fake tans 2 how morality is practised: I dare you to state to the players that that they are immoral. As for the distinction between RL and "true life form" , icon_eek.gif" alt="icon_eek.gif" title="Shocked" /> , I must have drank too much before matches and believed that what I saw on the meadow was true to life. Oh well, at least now I can relax knowing it is all an illusion. Benthamite ethics at their best.