Morgan is clearly a sore loser, this is all it boils down to.

He can say whatever he wants. All this 'don't criticise the refs', etc. is laughable.

He made a couple of major errors in that game - which is allowable, I guess, as long as he learns from them...e.g. in future dont shout "play on" when you mean "tackled", simple things like that.

Maybe if he wants to seriously raise issues about refs, he should perhaps refrain from raising the issue straight after his team got a thumping. It just smacks of sour grapes. Just a thought.

And perhaps through a more appropriate channel than an after-match press conference?



As was said on another forum















You (and he) may find that that is not in fact the case.

He didn't. See my comment on the appropriate thread.

I know it's not the case but why shouldn't it be? He should be allowed to say whatever he wants, like yourself and I can.

See my earlier post (or think of it like public criticism of the moderation process on here). There are ways and means (if he's got real complaints) – a public attack on an officials isn't one of them.

Correction. He should grow up, and behave like an adult. he should learn how to lose gracefully, and he should use the proper channels if he has issues with officiating.



There is no reason why he shouldn't make tempered, proportionate replies to questions. There is every reason why he shouldn't behave like an ignorant, loudmouth, obnoxious twa=white[size=9.[/sizet. Responsibilities come with his elevated position, and he has let himself, his club and the game down appallingly, and set an extraordinarily bad example.



He has also unfairly reviled one of the country's top referees, knowing the object of his cheap slurs has no right of reply.



He should be ashamed of himself. At least Ricky Stuart was man enough to recognise how inappropriately he'd behaved. I'd recommend some of the same medicine to Justine.

Overreacted much? Calm down





He's not the first and definitely won't be the last, yet the refereeing standard has dropped, if anything. Coaches are only human and it's their jobs that are on the line at the end of the day.

The bottom line here is Hudds were too good for HKR,and the coach should except that, its is players who he should be slagging off not the Ref.

That, with respect, is just your lightweight view. I would say that - professional referee slaggers aside (and there are a fair few of those)- we have seen a lot of excellent refereeing this season so far, and the situation is (to any but the blind and irreversibly prejudiced) a whole lot better than the penaltythons we were having this time last year.





Don't make me laugh, whatever went on in that game, nothing the referee did bore any relation to Morgan's job tenure, which is hardly under threat. Even in the heat of the moment, Morgan was not speaking out of control, he'd no need to go overboard.



And whether or not his "job is on the line", this was in any case nothing to do with his attack. It was a very personal tirade making very specific and apalling accusations of incompetence.

Yes, Morgan did.

He's spitting his dummy put pure and simple. He's well within his rights to question and even complain about a referees performance but there are proper channels and I would suggest moaning in the media is not the best way to go about it.



As for refs been wrapped in cotton wool, what good would it do if Cummins came out and the ens of every round critisising his employees in the press, I'm sure they review the performances and try and improve. The moaning about referees by fans and managers alike is laughable at times.



Refs make mistakes, players make mistakes and managers make mistakes, its human nature, deal with it.



The refs do a very difficult job, the are making these decisions at match pace and often make decisions based on what the touch judge says apart from televised games they don't have the luxury of replays on TV. As I said the berating of referees by managers is getting stupid and I hope Morgan gets punishment for his latest outburst, he seems to be a very sore loser.

Again, I'll go back to my original post:



The point is, everyone you mentioned above is publicly accountable for their mistakes except referees.



If Justin kept quiet and approached the RFL about Mr Thaler's performace do you really think anything would be done about it? Nope. You can slam him as unprofessional or whatever you want, but referees need to be brought down from their pedestals and made accountable for their p*ss poor performances publicly!

Why? what would it achieve? probably a drop in refereeing numbers I would suspect.

You are taking it as a "given" that there was something wrong with the referee's performance. That is your error as it is just the opinion of Morgan and some disgruntled fans of the losing team. Such reports as I've read, for example, don't slag off the ref.





Careful, your agenda is showing. If that idiotic generalised view is what you really think, your opinion is not to be taken seriously.

Yeah very mature idea.

And a complete reversal of RFL policy, judging by their handling of Ian Smith's spat with Daniel Anderson last season...

Sorry Mr 14000 posts, your opinion is obviosuly more valid than mine because you don't like what I have to say





What exactly is my "agenda"? All I want is to see an improvement in refereeing standard and if that means dropping refs if they aren't good enough then so be it.

Well having Thaler always in charge wouldn't solve anything, and would be unfair on us, seeing as how he is clueless and almost as bad as Alibert.

No you want them publicly accountable, I'm curious as to what you think this would achieve, I am also wondering how a few games in lower leagues would help the performance of a SL ref. I'm sure when refs have a bad performance it gets review by the boss, just as when players do, you very rarely see managers come out and say 'joe bloggs was terrible today he did this wrong he did that wrong'.



Blaming the ref is avoiding the reason the team lost the game.

Not if there was nobody to replace you.

Hull KR started well and took a very early 8 zip lead. Huddersfield started poorly and then lost Fulton to a knee injury. Things were looking good for a Rovers win. However, as time went on Huddersfield came back into the game. Started making a few breaks, scored a try and kicked the touchline conversion.



The crowing started. "Forward!" they cried. No penalty. My, how can this be? The Rovers fans say penalty, surely a penalty it must be!



But no, Thaler chose to use his eyes and those of his touchjudges rather than the eyes of Hull KR fans twitchy at seeing their side lose their grip on the game. Morgan, used to seeing his side getting calls when the Rovers fans scream for a decision, was perplexed. Surely he should give the forward pass. After all, they called for it! It surely must be so!



I think much of this is frustration at watching a game go away from Rovers. They were looking good after ten minutes but it drifted away and they tried to sway the ref by calling forward etc every two seconds and booing when we had the ball. It was actually funny by the end, behind the sticks we Huddersfield speccies started joining in!

I'm sorry but why is it almost seen as taboo to criticise a ref's performance after a game if they have made a few mistakes? Wrapping them up in cotton wool helps no one as it further adds to the fans frustrations if mistakes are happening and no responsibility is being owned up to.



Why is it seen as to much to ask for refs to hold their hands up and apologise after they make some bad decisions? Players are coaches are big enough to do it when mistakes occur so why can’t ref’s?



It’s just typical people in power not wanting to be held accountable to the public for the decisions they make.