Agreed.

Just watched one of those high intense games OZWelsh was talking about this morning. Warriors v Cowboys. Was a cracker with the result in the balance until the last minute.

Don't try and discredit me.

You know, as do most that across the board the RL is more intense than SL. Many in Aus. say that SL is the equivalent of the QLD Cup, they're not far wrong seeing that T McCarthy was playing Q Cup last year.

Obv. not all NRL matches are going to be v intense, esp. when N QLD knew that they could beat this Warriors side playing in second gear; no Johnson, Townsend, Leuluai.

Oh dear, somebody disagreeing with you





I would say, as many others have done previously, that top of SL is roughly of a similar standard to mid NRL, mid SL similar to bottom of NRL. Though some players seem to buck the trend in both directions, e.g. Josh Hodgson and Cuthbertson.

I don't mind ppl disagreeing with me, just would rather people not get personal.

just give your opinion.

On Hodgson, well he did play for England last yr. Whereas Cuthbertson...

And as Bill Harrigan said on Triple M last yr; in every round of the NRL there has always bn one very good match, one very poor match with most somewhere in the middle. I would say that he's quite accurate there.