Charging away fans the same for a behind the sticks view as the home fans are charged for a seat along the side is out of order.

The Hull fans at the opposite end with the same view are charged less whichever way you look at it.

The RFL should look into this. Totally wrong IMO.

Bloody Norah, you're like herpes. Just when you think it's all clear you flare up again

Its those Hull lasses

The 2007 game was the 2nd round of the play offs so the 16k gate is slightly exaggerated because of this. You have a point. But in a perverse sort of way the whole reason for the thread, the price disparity for home and away fans, is actually Hull FC trying to attract back those missing home fans by offering those who would attend more games at the KC on a yearly basis, a more affordable option.

The point, which you are persisting in missing, is that I never quoted any statistics (percentages, ratio's numerical data). So I had no reason to respond to your question regarding stats.

And, yes, basing something on what you see. The lawyers out there would call this Witness evidence

So basically your argument lacks any credible evidence or rigour then? Its down to your own perspective and interpretation...oh dear