Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
Quoteking warrior="king warrior"Hmmm how much did myler cost?
Fielden signed years ago my point is we spent sweet fa (a little on deacon) yet mm has changed it around'"
I don't think he had a lot to change around to be honest(3 GF eliminators) I just think he needed to tweak slightly and find a higher level of consistency.
QuoteG1="G1"Why, in that case, have no Leeds players been recognised since 2004 despite winning 4 championships, playing in 5 GFs and topping the table twice?'"
Because there have been players who have been more deserving during those years.
QuoteMcClennan="McClennan"Because there have been players who have been more deserving during those years.'"
Obviously, just for those 5 years there have been more deserving players during those years. But now the Goons are top of the table, one of their players must win it. FACT?
QuoteMoney Mayweather="Money Mayweather"Pffft. Andy Farrell got the sympathy vote in 2004 despite there being about 4 or 5 Leeds players being more deserving.
And Peacock should've got it last season IMO'"
It can happen you know. Sometimes a player plays above others and they are not in the best team. I remember when Adrian Vowles won it and there was no complaints from me despite his team's finishing position. You could say that Peacock deserved it more last year, however there were plenty in with as good a shout as Peacock including Hodgson.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.