Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
On reflection it was a game we probably got away with in the end. I think it showed up our lack of size for a SL side and your lot exploited that and made a lot more easy yards than we managed.
Thought you showed up well for this point in the season and with a few players missing. Shame Luaki never played, he was always fun when we played Hull.
Can't see you making promotion this year, Leigh look very strong and the likeliest to be able to make it but saying that if a couple of SL sides pick up injuries and go in on a run of bad form then anything can happen, just think the difference in cap will tell over a number of games.
On reflection it was a game we probably got away with in the end. I think it showed up our lack of size for a SL side and your lot exploited that and made a lot more easy yards than we managed.
Thought you showed up well for this point in the season and with a few players missing. Shame Luaki never played, he was always fun when we played Hull.
Can't see you making promotion this year, Leigh look very strong and the likeliest to be able to make it but saying that if a couple of SL sides pick up injuries and go in on a run of bad form then anything can happen, just think the difference in cap will tell over a number of
">games.'"
Difficult to is disagree with any of that. We don't even know what a preferred starting line up would be.....Lowes is the Tinker man. ...... The line up changes weekly. We have 3 more big props didn't show yesterday. Some changes down to injury and some due to experimentation and rest breaks. I think the idea is to arrive at the middle eights with a well rested squad and no risk on injuries. There is a fair amount of SL experience in the squad ........ but I doubt we will look strong until we need to.
Quote="barham red"Anyway back onto the game....
On reflection it was a game we probably got away with in the end. I think it showed up our lack of size for a SL side and your lot exploited that and made a lot more easy yards than we managed.
Thought you showed up well for this point in the season and with a few players missing. Shame Luaki never played, he was always fun when we played Hull.
Can't see you making promotion this year, Leigh look very strong and the likeliest to be able to make it but saying that if a couple of SL sides pick up injuries and go in on a run of bad form then anything can happen, just think the difference in cap will tell over a number of
">games.'"
Difficult to is disagree with any of that. We don't even know what a preferred starting line up would be.....Lowes is the Tinker man. ...... The line up changes weekly. We have 3 more big props didn't show yesterday. Some changes down to injury and some due to experimentation and rest breaks. I think the idea is to arrive at the middle eights with a well rested squad and no risk on injuries. There is a fair amount of SL experience in the squad ........ but I doubt we will look strong until we need to.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
