|
Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682cf/682cf4882e7e49b0451ad5ba5218cc0cec1e3a9f" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4c6/de4c66c2eefbc43bb4ffae992bb36e8ab28af9ec" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1534 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Jan 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="Rarebreed"Here's another reason that the Bonus Point is patently unfair:
looking at the Championship table Whitehaven and Batley were both on 39 points (Batley in relegation zone due to 3 points deduction for fielding ineligible player) but Whitehaven had won 11 games to Batley's 10 however Batley were above them because they had an extra bonus point (for losing) and a drawn game.
Remember the points are 3 for a win 2 for a draw, and 1 if lost by 12 or less..
So let's compare a hypothetical club result to emphasise how wrong it could be..let's use Haven and Batley as the example...
Both teams are at 39 points with either being relegation candidates in the battle to stay above 10th in the table, which this year will see them go into the conference league.
Lets suppose that each have two more games to play?
Haven have the easiest run in and Batley the hardest:
Haven are 9th and Batley are 8th (because Batley have a better points difference, even though they have lost one game more than Haven).
So when they play the two games Haven results are (this is now hypothetical, as they are fictitious games) one game won 3 points and one game lost by over 12 points (no bonus point)> Total points to add to the 39 points makes it 42 but scoring ave is still below Batley:
Batley now: Results from their two games: Draw and a loss by 12 points points awarded 2 for a draw and 1 Bonus point = 3 or 42.
The actual games won by Whitehaven would be 12 (see actual results to date in LE) and points 42 Batley actual games won is 10 points 42>> Batley though have the better points average for and against..so Whitehaven finish 10th and are relegated and Batley stay up..
Apologies to fans of either team, I am only using your teams as an example as you are the nearest to the unjust system of the Bonus point ?
Another misnomer is the 2 points for a draw, it used to be a drawn game shared the points equally ie 1 point in SL... this is ok for the two teams concerned, but as the example shows patently unfair for other teams in the competition, if they haven't had any draws or a low bonus point reading..
You might prefer to stick pins up your cuticles, and I'll forgive you if you just say rubbish. and don't bother to read ">it.'"
this is agreat example, i hate the system and have done since its inception, we got a bonus point on sunday at eagles despite never once being in the lead in the game.
Also some teams are now safe due to bonus points where under the old system they would not be ,against fev we took a pen in the last minute just to get a bonus point,its just wrong
|
|
Quote ="Rarebreed"Here's another reason that the Bonus Point is patently unfair:
looking at the Championship table Whitehaven and Batley were both on 39 points (Batley in relegation zone due to 3 points deduction for fielding ineligible player) but Whitehaven had won 11 games to Batley's 10 however Batley were above them because they had an extra bonus point (for losing) and a drawn game.
Remember the points are 3 for a win 2 for a draw, and 1 if lost by 12 or less..
So let's compare a hypothetical club result to emphasise how wrong it could be..let's use Haven and Batley as the example...
Both teams are at 39 points with either being relegation candidates in the battle to stay above 10th in the table, which this year will see them go into the conference league.
Lets suppose that each have two more games to play?
Haven have the easiest run in and Batley the hardest:
Haven are 9th and Batley are 8th (because Batley have a better points difference, even though they have lost one game more than Haven).
So when they play the two games Haven results are (this is now hypothetical, as they are fictitious games) one game won 3 points and one game lost by over 12 points (no bonus point)> Total points to add to the 39 points makes it 42 but scoring ave is still below Batley:
Batley now: Results from their two games: Draw and a loss by 12 points points awarded 2 for a draw and 1 Bonus point = 3 or 42.
The actual games won by Whitehaven would be 12 (see actual results to date in LE) and points 42 Batley actual games won is 10 points 42>> Batley though have the better points average for and against..so Whitehaven finish 10th and are relegated and Batley stay up..
Apologies to fans of either team, I am only using your teams as an example as you are the nearest to the unjust system of the Bonus point ?
Another misnomer is the 2 points for a draw, it used to be a drawn game shared the points equally ie 1 point in SL... this is ok for the two teams concerned, but as the example shows patently unfair for other teams in the competition, if they haven't had any draws or a low bonus point reading..
You might prefer to stick pins up your cuticles, and I'll forgive you if you just say rubbish. and don't bother to read ">it.'"
this is agreat example, i hate the system and have done since its inception, we got a bonus point on sunday at eagles despite never once being in the lead in the game.
Also some teams are now safe due to bonus points where under the old system they would not be ,against fev we took a pen in the last minute just to get a bonus point,its just wrong
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17168 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="Homer_J_Simpson"
I would suggest that all Bulls fans wait and have a look how it works before writing it off as a bad ">idea.'"
Don't be ridiculous. Much better to have hysterical, knee-jerk reactions.
|
|
Quote ="Homer_J_Simpson"
I would suggest that all Bulls fans wait and have a look how it works before writing it off as a bad ">idea.'"
Don't be ridiculous. Much better to have hysterical, knee-jerk reactions.
|
|
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 7594 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2021 | May 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I suppose we have to experience it to see how it works. Just looking at it and watching and forming an opinion based on that is clearly beyond the wit of man.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 10969 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2023 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
Quote ="Homer_J_Simpson":2bcvll12Had bonus points for a while now in our League, most championship fans like it. Certainly makes for some cracking last quarters in close games.
I would suggest that all Bulls fans wait and have a look how it works before writing it off as a bad :2bcvll12">idea.'" throughout the pro / semi pro leagues.
|
|
Quote ="Homer_J_Simpson":2bcvll12Had bonus points for a while now in our League, most championship fans like it. Certainly makes for some cracking last quarters in close games.
I would suggest that all Bulls fans wait and have a look how it works before writing it off as a bad :2bcvll12">idea.'" throughout the pro / semi pro leagues.
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="vbfg"I suppose we have to experience it to see how it works. Just looking at it and watching and forming an opinion based on that is clearly beyond the wit of ">man.'"
Same as like cauliflower.
|
|
Quote ="vbfg"I suppose we have to experience it to see how it works. Just looking at it and watching and forming an opinion based on that is clearly beyond the wit of ">man.'"
Same as like cauliflower.
|
|
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 10969 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2023 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
..or even [inot[/i liking cauliflower data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" />
|
|
..or even [inot[/i liking cauliflower data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" />
|
|
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4c6/de4c66c2eefbc43bb4ffae992bb36e8ab28af9ec" alt="" | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
---|
19.67M +2 | 488 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
|
|