Of course, that would more than likely be the only path to tread should liquidation happen, but it should be a considered option should Caisley be shown up to be the charlatan that he is, and has ridden roughshod over the loyal fans, players and staff to get his grubby paws on what remains. Rise up and viva le revolution? I'd go along with it, for sure.........

Quote ="Bulliac"No problems with Gary Tasker coming in, none at all; only thing is didn't the (much derided) conspiracy theory suggest Nobby as coach and Tasker as chief exec with S.O. Else ( icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> ) as chairman; amazing how the administrator seems to have [iexactly[/i thd same ideas as the main shareholder.....Just [iuncanny[/i. Maybe, afterwards, there should be an inquiry into how the admin period has been conducted?'" A desire amongst everyone involved to move on and make a new start seems to ensure this never happens whenever any sports club comes out of the other side of an administration period, whatever dodgy looking things may have gone on during it.

Quote ="Bulliac"No problems with Gary Tasker coming in, none at all; only thing is didn't the (much derided) conspiracy theory suggest Nobby as coach and Tasker as chief exec with S.O. Else ( icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" title="Laughing" /> ) as chairman; amazing how the administrator seems to have [iexactly[/i thd same ideas as the main shareholder.....Just [iuncanny[/i. Maybe, afterwards, there should be an inquiry into how the admin period has been conducted?'" A desire amongst everyone involved to move on and make a new start seems to ensure this never happens whenever any sports club comes out of the other side of an administration period, whatever dodgy looking things may have gone on during it.

People don't want to hear Guilfoyle say Caisley is not going to acquire the club. They want to hear Caisley say it, and swear it. If BG is telling the truth and the whole truth, then the single biggest impediment to sorting the mess out is now Caisley's silence.



If the man thinks anything about the club or anyone else, can I urge him to come out NOW and confirm he is not in the frame, nor will he ever be. In straight, unequivocal words so no one can accuse him of being disingenuous or playing games with semantics.



At some future time, he may choose to tell us why he chose to put the club into administration if he had no intent himself of buying it, or indeed why he ousted the previous board if he had intention of owning or running it. Or even why it WAS his intention, but he changed his mind or got cold feet or whatever. But that is for another day.



For now, until and unless he makes an unequivocal statement, I suggest many people will continue to believe he is ready to pounce at the last minute. And that will continue to fuel the fires of the vitriolic (and probably -or at least I hope - largely unfair) backlash against Noble and I suspect to a lesser extent Tasker from tomorrow, as well as to deter people who might want to take positive steps from doing so.



So it's all down to you now Chris: make your play; or confirm you are out.



And I look forward to Guilfoyle confirming that maybe two or three new bids have "suddenly" been thrown into the ring.

Incidentally, I cannot believe Guilfoyle would deliberately ignore potential bidders, and refuse to treat with them. He knows full well that an aggrieved party, if they had proof, would almost certainly complain to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, alleging professional misconduct, quite apart maybe from the High Court. That is surely a risk someone in his position of trust as an officer of the Court would not wish to take, and therefore I surely cannot conceive that he would?

Caisley is without doubt calling the shots here ! As was said months ago in a previous post about GT and BN taking over the posts of coach and chief exec. How can BG not have been influenced by CC over this, too big a coincidence for me. icon_twisted.gif" alt="icon_twisted.gif" title="Twisted Evil" />

Caisley is without doubt calling the shots here ! As was said months ago in a previous post about GT and BN taking over the posts of coach and chief exec. How can BG not have been influenced by CC over this, too big a coincidence for me. icon_twisted.gif" alt="icon_twisted.gif" title="Twisted Evil" />

Quote ="Adeybull"Hey, I am not angry at Wakefield fans! Don't forget I gave some help when they were setting up their trust, and like you contributed to their own fundraising. Lot of time for the vast majority of them as fans, always have had. My issue is with the handful who keep lecturing us what we should have done, despite us repeatedly explaining why we as a fanbase could not. It's gone way past friendly advise, and is becoming both counterproductive and wearing ">now.'" Adey, it was in no way meant to be a dig at you or other members of your board. I fully appreciate it is a fairly thankless task trying to run a Trust and persuade even a small minority of the fan base that it is worthwhile. I know that our board are very grateful for the help you gave to us when we were establishing our Trust. I guess the question I was asking was around how much help or not you had received from SD bearing in mind when we were setting up this is what they advocated for us, although we were not established in time to actually do anything about it. Sorry if I caused offence, it was not meant. I guess having been through tthe Administration thing ourselves and having had to listen to people painting us a less than true picture of the actual circumstances the club was in, it all seemed a bit familiar.

Quote ="Adeybull"Hey, I am not angry at Wakefield fans! Don't forget I gave some help when they were setting up their trust, and like you contributed to their own fundraising. Lot of time for the vast majority of them as fans, always have had. My issue is with the handful who keep lecturing us what we should have done, despite us repeatedly explaining why we as a fanbase could not. It's gone way past friendly advise, and is becoming both counterproductive and wearing ">now.'" Adey, it was in no way meant to be a dig at you or other members of your board. I fully appreciate it is a fairly thankless task trying to run a Trust and persuade even a small minority of the fan base that it is worthwhile. I know that our board are very grateful for the help you gave to us when we were establishing our Trust. I guess the question I was asking was around how much help or not you had received from SD bearing in mind when we were setting up this is what they advocated for us, although we were not established in time to actually do anything about it. Sorry if I caused offence, it was not meant. I guess having been through tthe Administration thing ourselves and having had to listen to people painting us a less than true picture of the actual circumstances the club was in, it all seemed a bit familiar.