Eastmond scored, should have been a try. I would even go as far as saying that Lomax could possibly have been a try too. Give those and i can't see us losing from there.



Child was very poor too, but poor for both teams. The decisions at the end was the correct though, Lynch took Gaskell out.

Quote ="EHW"Definately not an obstruction. The defending player didnt come into contact with the Saints obstructor (Dixon?) and, like you say, even managed to make an attempted tackle on Lomax. /> Both those tries should have been awarded, meaning that the score could have been 16/18 nil at that point.'" /> It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.

Quote ="EHW"Definately not an obstruction. The defending player didnt come into contact with the Saints obstructor (Dixon?) and, like you say, even managed to make an attempted tackle on Lomax. /> Both those tries should have been awarded, meaning that the score could have been 16/18 nil at that point.'" /> It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.

Quote ="Saddened!"It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.'" /> Correct, it would never have been a try anyway

Quote ="Saddened!"It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.'" /> Correct, it would never have been a try anyway

I know we won't get the point back but at the end of the season that could cost us a place in the jostle for home and away ties etc. It would have taken us above the pies on the league table. Could be very costly to us - but never write the saints off. ( No matter how hard they try to put us down)

Quote ="Saddened!"It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.'" /> Just watched the play again on the Superleague Show, looked an OK try for me. Dixon didn't make contact with anybody and Lomax didn't "shepherd" either. So that was 12 points chalked off by I. Smith.

Quote ="Saddened!"It certainly wasn't obstruction, the defender ignored Dixon and went for and got the right man. Just he hit him in the neck and couldn't do much to stop him by doing that. /> I'm not sure Lomax managed to ground the ball however. Smith didn't even run the tape through, he'd made his mind up as soon as Childs put the square in the air.'" /> Just watched the play again on the Superleague Show, looked an OK try for me. Dixon didn't make contact with anybody and Lomax didn't "shepherd" either. So that was 12 points chalked off by I. Smith.

I have just looked at the RFL website on the Disciplinary section. /> I was expecting too see J Child - Charge - Unable to count. /> T Martin (or it may have been P Marklove) - Charge - Blind in charge of a touch judges flag. /> Sadly neither of them are up before the "committee"

I have just looked at the RFL website on the Disciplinary section. /> I was expecting too see J Child - Charge - Unable to count. /> T Martin (or it may have been P Marklove) - Charge - Blind in charge of a touch judges flag. /> Sadly neither of them are up before the "committee"