Problem is we now have to tick the box to be able to apply again.



Leigh have already done so and they have as strong a bid as we do.



the squad we have we all know is good enough to win silverwear but how long will this squad stick together, I'd rather win this seasons grand final so we dont have to worry about whether we can keep the better players for next season

Quote ="urbancarrot"I have 1 view on the clubs statement. If you think the club wanted that statement to be made you are an idiot. End of ">thread.'" a014.gif" alt="a014.gif" title="bow down" />

Quote ="urbancarrot"I have 1 view on the clubs statement. If you think the club wanted that statement to be made you are an idiot. End of ">thread.'" a014.gif" alt="a014.gif" title="bow down" />

Quote ="urbancarrot"I have 1 view on the clubs statement. If you think the club wanted that statement to be made you are an idiot. End of ">thread.'" Ditto

Quote ="urbancarrot"I have 1 view on the clubs statement. If you think the club wanted that statement to be made you are an idiot. End of ">thread.'" Ditto

Quote ="johnny freeman fan club"Crusaders were put in instead of you, are you saying that you would not have fared better than Crusaders , who went bust , didn`t pay players , moved nearer to the heartlands when they got in as an expansion club , employed illegal players against the law of the land and that is just what we know about.All under the watchful eye of the RFL the expansion policy is another thing we are challenging , they have made a total cock up of ">it.'" im not saying anything on that subject. thats not what i was responding too. I was responding to the inference that we only got in because our chairman licked RFL for 3 years. we got in because our application was good enough.

Quote ="johnny freeman fan club"Crusaders were put in instead of you, are you saying that you would not have fared better than Crusaders , who went bust , didn`t pay players , moved nearer to the heartlands when they got in as an expansion club , employed illegal players against the law of the land and that is just what we know about.All under the watchful eye of the RFL the expansion policy is another thing we are challenging , they have made a total cock up of ">it.'" im not saying anything on that subject. thats not what i was responding too. I was responding to the inference that we only got in because our chairman licked RFL for 3 years. we got in because our application was good enough.

Quote ="vikingsmurf"im not saying anything on that subject. thats not what i was responding too. I was responding to the inference that we only got in because our chairman licked RFL booty for 3 years. we got in because our application was good ">enough.'" I didn`t infer that in fact quite the opposite what I am infering, is your aplication was more than likely better than Crusaders 3yrs ago and you were kept out when you would have done a good deal better than them.

Quote ="vikingsmurf"im not saying anything on that subject. thats not what i was responding too. I was responding to the inference that we only got in because our chairman licked RFL booty for 3 years. we got in because our application was good ">enough.'" I didn`t infer that in fact quite the opposite what I am infering, is your aplication was more than likely better than Crusaders 3yrs ago and you were kept out when you would have done a good deal better than them.

Quote ="johnny freeman fan club"I didn`t infer that in fact quite the opposite what I am infering, is your aplication was more than likely better than Crusaders 3yrs ago and you were kept out when you would have done a good deal better than ">them.'" not really sure what conversation your having my friend. my original post (to which you then responded) was itself a response to a post from another person that had nothing directly to do with your points. are you mistaking me for somebody else?

Quote ="johnny freeman fan club"I didn`t infer that in fact quite the opposite what I am infering, is your aplication was more than likely better than Crusaders 3yrs ago and you were kept out when you would have done a good deal better than ">them.'" not really sure what conversation your having my friend. my original post (to which you then responded) was itself a response to a post from another person that had nothing directly to do with your points. are you mistaking me for somebody else?