Its a good job all the the other political parties are full of people with very high morals.................................

Who mentioned 'morals' (whatever they are)?



I thought this was about stupidity?

Proof that it isn't just the Tory party that is full of "Swivel-eyed loons"

"wouldn't have happened had she been wearing trousers"

I think he has missed the fact that there are trousers specifically designed for women. Tight jeans / trousers can make some women look very good!

They can also make some look awful, especially when they should be wearing a size 22 and insist they look good in a size 14 pair, with the short top to match

Fortunately, no man would ever dress in comparable manner.

Yes, there are some shocking sights if you hit any major town / city after dark.

I'd hope not in crop tops.

I've seen more than one or two men wandering around with tops/shirts that do not meet their trousers. This Comic Book Guy.

I suppose its ok if your 'ripped' but no-one would want to see me in such a state of dress

Indeed, any sunny Sunday will bring out the cargo-shorts-and-too-short-polo-shirt brigade.

Legs like hairy sausages and a wobbly white midriff is not a style statement.

I'm still attempting to sue The Simpsons for using my likeness without recompense.

Me, The Algarve, 2 weeks time...

The thing is, I don't actually care what people - male or female - wear.



There are things that I think look stupid - jeans that reveal the undies for one - but why would I assume that people should dress to impress me or the general public, unless it's a work requirement etc?



What's also interesting about this discussion is that nobody (that I have noticed - so apologies if wrong) has mentioned that he has actually taken photographs of women's bums and published them in a book to discuss his 'theories'.



Surely this is an invasion of privacy?



And besides, if we want to get into his 'argument', then it's a fairly well-known fact that men's trousers can sometimes do damage to the ability of he body to produce sperm, so the idea that men were designed for trousers and visa versa is errant nonsense.



Besides, perhaps he'd like to consider his fellow Greeks who wear skirts as ceremonial military dress (several Balkan nations do and that's without mention Celtic kilts).

Aye, best to blend in.

The rather fetching livid basketwork pattern on the back of the knees when you stand up to leave the restaurant just can't be achieved any other way.

I do hope you are only taking the one polo to dress up the ensemble in the evenings ... and a vest for daytime?

Your conclusion, whilst true, is not backed by your argument.

"Bad" trousers can damage, not all trousers per se.

Damage is much more likely from too-tight or too-loose underwear.

One's spheroids deserve a bit of support.





See what you did there?

You tried to counter a nutter with a logical statement.

With just the 5kg of luggage there isn't a lot of room for much more than you are actually wearing when you turn up at the airport.

Hence my "sometimes"