You used neither in your [url=http://viewtopic.php?p=17060833&tsmp=1344675570#p17060833original post[/url. Nor in this [url=http://viewtopic.php?p=17061479&tsmp=1344676429#p17061479follow up post[/url.

Are you still unable to see the very clear pattern in the deficit from 1991-1996? It increases during the recession, peaks the year after the recession ends and then reduces year on year after that. This pattern continues all the way to the Labour surpluses from 1998-2000.

Comparisons of this period to Labour's overspending from 2002-2007 are simply not valid as the economy was not in a comparable state. It is as meaningless a comparison as saying that Labour ran an even greater deficit for the two years 2008-2009 than in either of those six year periods. Context matters.

My opinion on what? That's what neither you nor dear old Sal could answer.

No, you obviously don't understand. It's about whether the argument put forward has any merit or credible evidence to back it up.


That's a very pathetic and weak way out isn't it? I hope they find your body quickly.

Yeah true.

What I find ironic is that we get labelled right wing but then someone says they would like to murder me because they don't agree with me.



Probably best not to bother.

Aww bless

An interesting and relevant read from a boule of years ago ... 2p.com/?p=5193

An interesting and relevant read from a boule of years ago ... 2p.com/?p=5193