Utter downer. I thought with the new, more basic style of play it would be much harder for us to be as headless as last season, but I was wrong. Our spine was really poor. They are the guys that need to take control when its going pear shaped and yet none of them did. Frawley just again looks a really poor player, but Ackers was poor and so were Smith and Croft. Add to that an edge defence that seemingly panics at the first sign of pressure, and it's all over.
There's a reason why Handley, who was a centre in his youth, has never lasted more than a game there - for all his talk and training there he shows no composure at all when defending in that position. Not just his fault - the lack of communication between second row, wing and centre was awful.
If available I think we have to bring in Clark-Wood and shove Handley back on the wing. Tough on Lumb but that edge will get taken apart every week. Hopefully either O'Connor or Sinfield are fit to take over at hooker. We need much more from there. I'd also put Edgell to full back and Connor to 7. Connor can't do worse there and his lack of speed will be less exposed. Jenkins must come in, maybe for second row, but I also find watching Cam Smith really painful in games like this. He's no captain and even after another off season with a changed style he finds a way to cripple attacking moves. I do not care how many second or third man in tackles he makes, before anyone lobs out the rather pointless stats.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20514 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
christopher wrote:Ive just typed a long rant and the forum reloaded.
Can’t be arsed typing it again.
Im fuming, im not saying we shouldn’t have got rid of Rohan but can you see us scoring some of those trys we did early on last year? I can’t
Concentrated on Fitness to the detrement of actually playing rugby.
You thought your lads looked fit?!
I thought the forwards were blowing very hard after about 20 minutes.
With us having to run with 2 small guys on the bench I thought your fitness would see you dominate in the second half so seeing your forwards walk to the restart when the clock was ticking down really surprised me.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Connor's kick return is frustrating. Just jogging/skipping. Not why we lost but speed up and you might break a tackle. Pack ran it in harder in 2nd half. If they'd done that in 1st half maybe we would have won. Not a total disaster but very disappointing
Working as a missionary for RL in Nottingham and Mansfield
Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13682 Location: West Yorkshire
jonh wrote:You thought your lads looked fit?!
I thought the forwards were blowing very hard after about 20 minutes.
With us having to run with 2 small guys on the bench I thought your fitness would see you dominate in the second half so seeing your forwards walk to the restart when the clock was ticking down really surprised me.
No they looked knackered which as I say is surprising seeing as that’s what theyve focused on all off season
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 9618 Location: anywhere, literally...
We still need to fix the front row, until we do that, we will not solve the main problem we have, one that affects our entire game plan. The forwards need to run much harder, tackle much harder and get us into position to give the halves and backs some space to play in. We lost because the pack got dominated. Again.
It's not how much talent you've got, it's what you do with it that counts.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum