Joined: Sep 20 2005 Posts: 1087 Location: The Yard
karetaker wrote:Just reading CTW won’t be in the 17, Lindop is in at centre and doubtful Ratchford gets in to the 17 also. Plan is that Dufty will play the full 80.
I reckon that if Lindop has a strong game, there's a fair chance he'll keep his place for the play-offs. There's lots to like about Tai, but his 'pass/don't pass' decision-making is shocking. Two big examples of that last week. He somehow got away with both of them then, but that won't always be the case, as Burgess will well know.
Joined: Apr 09 2010 Posts: 12930 Location: The Moon
The Speculator wrote:I reckon that if Lindop has a strong game, there's a fair chance he'll keep his place for the play-offs. There's lots to like about Tai, but his 'pass/don't pass' decision-making is shocking. Two big examples of that last week. He somehow got away with both of them then, but that won't always be the case, as Burgess will well know.
Burgess said he expects Tai to only be out the 1 week.
Were running for the line and cannot leave anything on the paddock, as we still could finish second. The squad selection reflects this. I hope that Dufty and LIndop should start at full back and centre respectively.
The Speculator wrote:I reckon that if Lindop has a strong game, there's a fair chance he'll keep his place for the play-offs. There's lots to like about Tai, but his 'pass/don't pass' decision-making is shocking. Two big examples of that last week. He somehow got away with both of them then, but that won't always be the case, as Burgess will well know.
The execution of those plays was sub optimal, but you don't drop someone for two plays where both outcomes were tries.
Joined: Sep 20 2005 Posts: 1087 Location: The Yard
just_browny wrote:The execution of those plays was sub optimal, but you don't drop someone for two plays where both outcomes were tries.
Outcomes against that Huddersfield defence are hardly relevant. What's more relevant is if he makes the same poor decisions in big games. He wouldn't have got away with it against Wigan's defence.
I’m a little torn with the Tai / Lindop (and Wrench) situation. Those 2 moments against Hudds would deffo have been fluffed against better opposition. But as others have said he is more solid in defence and that could get us home in a tight game. I think Wrench has been a bit suspect in defence and although Lindop hasn’t played many games i feel he has been more dependable. I think during the playoffs we will revert back to Tai as i think the games will be tighter and we have other strike options across the pitch to make up for his lack of attacking prowess.
Joined: Jun 25 2006 Posts: 14103 Location: Forum21
just_browny wrote:The execution of those plays was sub optimal, but you don't drop someone for two plays where both outcomes were tries.
I don't think anyone is arguing that case. It just highlighted his attacking weakness in relation to passing/decision making and whether this may cost us.
I long for the day when we can have a centre like Wardle, until then Tai can attempt to improve in this area under the watchful eye of one of the best - Gleeson.
Joined: Sep 20 2005 Posts: 1087 Location: The Yard
just_browny wrote:The execution of those plays was sub optimal, but you don't drop someone for two plays where both outcomes were tries.
Just to clarify, I wouldn't have dropped Tai for this week either, despite those two plays. My point was just that with Tai having been left out (for whatever reason), Lindop now has a good chance to make a claim for keeping his place. As I said, there's lots to like about Tai, and hopefully he can improve the parts of his game that still need work.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
