DSJ1983 wrote:We don’t know who the investor is. They can’t move the club if they don’t own it outright, but I can’t see anyone wanting to do that anyways.

We got a provisional grade A license despite underperforming for years and spending way under the cap limit. The reason why we might be attracting investors is that you could possibly reason that it will only take a relatively low investment to have us competing again as the infrastructure is mostly in place already, can’t see anyone wanting to spend millions and millions on a ground.

DSJ1983 wrote:You’d think it would make sense whatever the nature of the deal to have it sorted in time for more certainty with stuff like season tickets, IMG grading etc. We really have no idea though who the potential investor or investors are though and what they want in return for the investment, any assurances etc it might just be a complex deal. The timescale was always the back end of the year supposedly.

moxi1 wrote:There is no mortgage, but you keep telling yourself there is if it helps you sleep at night.

Theeaststander1 wrote:anything with investment especially from thirkell whos a lifelong leeds fan & president warrants a caveat on top

what is the but in all of this ?

is he going to move hull fc away from the KCOM ?

Roam Ranger wrote:I don't have any issues with a potential new owner being a fan of another club. It could be that he fancies owning a rugby club after all these years and knows that Leeds isn't an option. He's seen FC and thinks we have potential. Similar to Adam Pearson back in the day when he was at Leeds United and bought Hull City. I think that it's fair to say that he gave it his all whilst their owner and there was never any questions about his affiliations with Leeds. So for me, there doesn't have to be a but and it can purely be something that is seen as a worthwhile investment opportunity. Time will tell of course. That's if it's even Thirkill that's investing in the first place, which we still don't know.

As for moving us out of the stadium, personally I would prefer us to have our own ground but I don't know if that's a possibility or not. Back when we moved in, everything seemed so perfect. A shiny new stadium, long term lease, good relationship with City and the SMC. Now everything feels so fragile and precarious. And the KC/KCOM/MKM has rarely felt like our home because of it.

DSJ1983 wrote:We don’t know who the investor is. They can’t move the club if they don’t own it outright, but I can’t see anyone wanting to do that anyways.

We got a provisional grade A license despite underperforming for years and spending way under the cap limit. The reason why we might be attracting investors is that you could possibly reason that it will only take a relatively low investment to have us competing again as the infrastructure is mostly in place already, can’t see anyone wanting to spend millions and millions on a ground.

Jake the Peg wrote:I disagree. I think the relationship is currently pretty good. if you go into the main reception there's a big Hull FC montage in there and plenty of our branding around the place. The difficulty for us is the cost of being in such a large stadium when we don't need it other than the derbies. It comes with additional costs. When city got into the premier league the rates bill went up significantly and we were forced to pay our share whilst rovers continued to pay a relative pittance. The main issue is we've not really leveraged the benefits of the stadium whilst copping for the disadvantages

Roam Ranger wrote:I absolutely agree the relationship has been improving. I guess I still have ill feelings about it all after what happened with the Allam's. It's their tenure that left me feeling that our tenancy has never really been that secure.

Jake the Peg wrote:no one is moving the club. Where would you move it to where there are 20k+ supporters within 30 minutes travel time?