RLFANS.COM -

Page 120 of 133

[ 1330 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123 ... 133 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 12:52 pm

Fantastic Mr Catpiss

Moderator

Joined: Mar 01 2002
Posts: 39612

MorePlaymakersNeeded wrote:As someone has already touched on, these kind of problems are the best to have. Lindop also comes into team selection difficulties.

he's come on well this year, i thought he looked a bit undersized opening game of the season against catalans

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:31 pm

karetaker

Player Coach

Joined: Apr 09 2010
Posts: 12023
Location: The Moon

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:41 pm

karetaker

Player Coach

Joined: Apr 09 2010
Posts: 12023
Location: The Moon

Common sense prevailed, of course some opposition fans will not be happy. Sims and Lomax in big trouble although Saints fans won’t be to unhappy about Lomax being banned I guess.

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:17 pm

Bunkaib

Academy Player

Joined: Mar 11 2023
Posts: 236

Percival a bigger loss than Lomax for Saints, I also think Lomax needs a surgery so if is at the higher end he might get it done. May be a blessing in disguise for them. I'd rather he got away with it he's been stinking the place out for them.

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:20 pm

The Speculator

Player Coach

Joined: Sep 20 2005
Posts: 1042
Location: The Yard

karetaker wrote:Common sense prevailed, of course some opposition fans will not be happy. Sims and Lomax in big trouble although Saints fans won’t be to unhappy about Lomax being banned I guess.

Is the Lomax incident the one he got sin-binned for? If so, the MRP are basically saying that the ref and video ref got it badly wrong on the night by describing it as just "low-level force", given that they have now ruled it Grade E. As for Sims, if they are being consistent he has to get the same punishment that Vaughan got.

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 4:37 pm

MorePlaymakersNeeded

Club Captain

Joined: Aug 24 2018
Posts: 4256

The Speculator wrote:Is the Lomax incident the one he got sin-binned for? If so, the MRP are basically saying that the ref and video ref got it badly wrong on the night by describing it as just "low-level force", given that they have now ruled it Grade E. As for Sims, if they are being consistent he has to get the same punishment that Vaughan got.

The magic word with refs and the panel, isn't it. Squirrel grip punishment differentials instantly come to mind, as an example where it is not applied.

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:02 pm

Big lads mate

International Star

Joined: Feb 21 2011
Posts: 5603

How on earth did Lisone not get a mention

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:10 pm

Alffi_7

Club Captain

Joined: Apr 09 2015
Posts: 2922

Good news on Dufty, play him this week then I’m hoping CTW gets a run vs London.

Top

Post subject: Re: This week’s disciplinary

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:06 pm

chapylad

International Board Member

Joined: Aug 02 2002
Posts: 7159
Location: Wakefield but near to Leeds!

Big lads mate wrote:How on earth did Lisone not get a mention

Players tend not to get a ban when the forearm hits the chest.
I can`t post the photo but it`s as clear as day there`s no head contact.
Like I said at the time had he led with his forearm to Russells head at that pace Russell would still be unconscious now.
Richard Silverwood reviewed it and said no case to answer.

Top