Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25762 Location: Back in Hull.
boardwalkempire4 wrote:Good to see a few more positive posts tonight. I don’t agree with Ashworth ban ! But like I said previously.. under this seasons guidelines it wasn’t a legal tackle… I didn’t like Barrie macdermott stirring it up on the commentary but the players have all been told how they must tackle in 2024.. the club have to deal with it.. As a cheeky positive .( light hearted ) If we keep 13 on the pitch then we have every chance of beating a weakened Leigh team. I’m expecting Huddersfield to beat kr too. So come the weekend we will likely be on level points with the unstoppables who are at full strength.. Let’s wait till we get more of our cap back on the pitch then see how we go..
Is there anywhere to see the guidance?
Is that's an illegal tackle, a player who dipped his body as well as the attacker on a wet surface then we are in trouble, sin bin and 2 or 3 match ban.
I think its also the inconsistencies, the Hurrell tackle fir example, I'm sure they are plenty of others.
Steve0 wrote:Cas hosting a meet the directors Q&A evening tonight, would be good for Pearson & Clarke to hold something similar in the next few months to clarify points around salary cap spend and future ambitions of the club
would be good but its far more difficult to look people in the eye and answer telling questions then using the HDM or Yorkshire post to put your spin to the fans
Dave K. wrote:That came from me , John Davidson posted it on twitter, has since deleted it.
Think the frustration from fans is about more than that though. The clubs in a real mess.
It’s a club that’s rebuilding in a changing rugby league context. I guess forums attract dramatic posts. I enjoy the game its athleticism, skill and hopefully its integrity. The downside is that, as in many spectator sports, the behaviour of a small majority of fans who imo are overly tribal leads to bad behaviour at games and on forums. ruins it for the majority of fans who are fair and can take adversity and defeat humbly
We've assembled a bottom 4 team so we'll lose more than we'll win , The financial side of the club isn't going to change overnight either so we're in for a bit of a slog this season which many new before a ball was kicked . AP has probably told TS the situation the club are in and has to work with what he's got for this season so they'll not be a lot of scope for movement there . I don't know what the club could add to that really until loans are paid .
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 4392 Location: Posh Bransholme
If Tindall fit interesting to see what TS does I reckon although controversial it would be Martin to be rested(dropped/left out). Gardiner, Laidlaw and Severs too miss out with Martin or Tindall Hoy McIntosh Carlos Sutcliffe Martin/Tindall F.Brown Smith Eesese Houghton Sao Okunbur Staveley Lane Subs Pele Scott J.Brown Charles
Always the Optimist never the Pessimist. Glass Half full not half empty man me.
Last edited by Ellam on Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ellam wrote:If Tindall fit interesting to see what TS does I reckon although controversial it would be Martin to be rested(dropped/left out). Hoy McIntosh Carlos Sutcliffe Martin/Tindall F.Brown Smith Eesese Houghton Sao Okunbur Staveley Lane Subs Pele/Scott/Gardiner Bullock J.Brown Balmforth/Charles
That would be unlucky for Martin , I think the kid has done alright since he's been in the first team .
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
