LOL not a sick individual or a sick fan and not laughing at a injured player . A lot of years ago was leaving Leigh, after a match on a Wakefield supporters bus when a building brick came through the bus window . Think that is the kind of fans that sums up your statement .

financialtimes wrote:It was an illegal tackle hence the card following video review, the fact that the panel didn't add any ban or fine means that NFA required and yellow sufficient. What part of that do you not understand? If that tackle was illegal he should be facing a lengthy ban, hence it wasn't illegal "No ban".What part of that do you not understand? I see they never picked up on these curiously >>> https://twitter.com/lewisboardman9/stat ... 7042114725 Shoulder charge to the head.

financialtimes wrote:It was an illegal tackle hence the card following video review, the fact that the panel didn't add any ban or fine means that NFA required and yellow sufficient. What part of that do you not understand? If that tackle was illegal he should be facing a lengthy ban, hence it wasn't illegal "No ban".What part of that do you not understand? I see they never picked up on these curiously >>> https://twitter.com/lewisboardman9/stat ... 7042114725 Shoulder charge to the head.

Lam needs to get a grip. It’s been raining solidly for two month. All pitches are heavy, the bloke simply can’t take a loss without some feeble moan

Maybe he does but, I was alluding to the tackle challenges, that's all.