dboy wrote:0.22 is bigger than 0.15.
Are you are saying that 7/11/11 averages as 9.666, and it's that calculation that is re-ranked and then attributed the performance score?
In that scenario, we would be 10/12/13 = 11.666, so you are looking at whether another club could/would drop in between and change the 3 year rankings?
Yes
Cas as 7/11/11 would be 3.3334 + 2.8889 + 2.8889 = 9.1114
Average over 3 years is 3.0371
This is the one area that's difficult to predict as you need to know where your team will finish but also where everyone else will finish.
Hull for example had 8/9/10 last time to give a score of 3.11 which put them lower than Cas. But if Cas finish 11th they would have to finish 10th to equal the score or higher to beat them.
In our case, the best we can get is 10/12/13 and that 13th ranking is calculated after the playoffs so if you are 5th but lose in the GF you are ranked as 2nd or 14th in the long list.
But there are additional bonus points for cup winners. Those points aren't included in the average. They are added for one year only.
It's hard to go through this without showing the spreadsheet.
Sorry to all those finding this boring. If I get chance I'll move it to another thread to keep this one about Cas redevelopment.
0.22 is bigger than 0.15.
