Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:35 pm
Dave K.
International Board Member
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25737 Location: Back in Hull.
Chris71 wrote:Not sure with Watts getting a 4 game ban which I think is harsh.
Still think the RFL have a major problem on their hands with the ineptitude of the MRP with Cullen as the Head/Chsir of the panel and needs resolving starting with Cullen being shown the door with immediate affect.
Got to be his previous record. Must have the record for most bans.
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:07 am
B0NES
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 15 2005 Posts: 12410 Location: Hull
Chris71 wrote:Not sure with Watts getting a 4 game ban which I think is harsh.
Still think the RFL have a major problem on their hands with the ineptitude of the MRP with Cullen as the Head/Chsir of the panel and needs resolving starting with Cullen being shown the door with immediate affect.
He's totally out of touch with the modern game , and proves everyone at the RFL / MRP and even the Referees are not singing from the same hymn sheet . I feel a little for Watts also .
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:23 am
Ellam
Club Owner
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 4386 Location: Posh Bransholme
Pele got to be happy with that. Sao common sense prevailed, Ese'ese tough one probably right unfortunately, Watts previous suspensions probably not helped.
Always the Optimist never the Pessimist. Glass Half full not half empty man me.
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:42 am
mwindass
Player Coach
Joined: Nov 19 2008 Posts: 5347
Ellam wrote:Pele got to be happy with that. Sao common sense prevailed, Ese'ese tough one probably right unfortunately, Watts previous suspensions probably not helped.
Though Ese'ese was lucky not to see red at the game so expected a few games. Pele has got off lightly, good job he didn't properly connect with Minchella
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:03 am
Chris71
Moderator
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8158 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
mwindass wrote:
Ellam wrote:Pele got to be happy with that. Sao common sense prevailed, Ese'ese tough one probably right unfortunately, Watts previous suspensions probably not helped.
Though Ese'ese was lucky not to see red at the game so expected a few games. Pele has got off lightly, good job he didn't properly connect with Minchella
As Meatloaf once sang 'Two out of Three ain't bad'. Got to be happy with Pele only getting 3 and then Sao reduced to 1.
Still feel Ese'ese was more than worth an appeal given the match officials are deemed as two of the best we have. Moore was very clear it was low force so only a yellow, its the gap between what both Moore & Kendal ajudged and then what the MRP/Cullen ajudged, as the disparity between the two is poles apart. This for me shows a concerning lack of being on the same page between the officials and MRP panel which can not be good.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:12 am
the cal train
International Star
Joined: May 12 2011 Posts: 3338 Location: West Hull
Think Pele was on for six+ weeks until the RFL got a sense of the media, public, and player reaction to round 1. For once the pre-season marketing seemed to be decent and they decided to torpedo the on field product at the first showing.
All men are created equal, some work harder in preseason. -Emmitt Smith
Post subject: Re: Possible fall out from Rnd 1 of 2024
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:49 pm
bonaire
International Star
Joined: Apr 04 2014 Posts: 7776
Chris71 wrote:As Meatloaf once sang 'Two out of Three ain't bad'. Got to be happy with Pele only getting 3 and then Sao reduced to 1.
Still feel Ese'ese was more than worth an appeal given the match officials are deemed as two of the best we have. Moore was very clear it was low force so only a yellow, its the gap between what both Moore & Kendal ajudged and then what the MRP/Cullen ajudged, as the disparity between the two is poles apart. This for me shows a concerning lack of being on the same page between the officials and MRP panel which can not be good.
When you have a panel that have backtracked on several appeals including a no charge for Brierley it clearly shows it is not fit for purpose. Thats a large percentage they have got wrong and surely the RFL must look into its future performance or bring in a new panel. If i were in the RFL i would be on the phone to Gaz Ellis and form a new panel around him
I noticed that the other day when I looked and it's as if they're proud of that fact as it just seems an odd thing to state when you'd think they'd be stating the MRP consists of the best people qualified etc, though they'd not be able to declare that when Paul 'cliché' Cullen is the Head/Chair of the MRP.
ComeOnYouUll wrote:A reminder of the panel and the process. They even point out that only one of the six is from Yorkshire.
I noticed that the other day when I looked and it's as if they're proud of that fact as it just seems an odd thing to state when you'd think they'd be stating the MRP consists of the best people qualified etc, though they'd not be able to declare that when Paul 'cliché' Cullen is the Head/Chair of the MRP.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 47 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
