Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13619 Location: West Yorkshire
Seth wrote:Similar to Mom last night for me, not a shoulder to the head but stepping across to shut the gap and cant get his arm wrapped around the ball carrier due to the supporting tackler. Hes made no play at the players head, very soft.
This is a good tweet to show it, he clearly hits him in the head with shoulder. It’s not like MOM’s tackle IMO, he leads with his shoulder.
Seth wrote:Similar to Mom last night for me, not a shoulder to the head but stepping across to shut the gap and cant get his arm wrapped around the ball carrier due to the supporting tackler. Hes made no play at the players head, very soft.
This is a good tweet to show it, he clearly hits him in the head with shoulder. It’s not like MOM’s tackle IMO, he leads with his shoulder.
christopher wrote:This is a good tweet to show it, he clearly hits him in the head with shoulder. It’s not like MOM’s tackle IMO, he leads with his shoulder.
Agree - shoulder to head, no mitigation. Fairly simple moving forward, bend your hips, tackle a bit lower and don’t make contact with the head. If you do you will almost automatically have a problem
christopher wrote:This is a good tweet to show it, he clearly hits him in the head with shoulder. It’s not like MOM’s tackle IMO, he leads with his shoulder.
Agree - shoulder to head, no mitigation. Fairly simple moving forward, bend your hips, tackle a bit lower and don’t make contact with the head. If you do you will almost automatically have a problem
ArthurClues wrote:Complete tosh. If you mean doesn't like idiotic thuggish play as evidenced by Pele the other night, you're right. If you mean players who compete, like Goudemand and McDonnell, you are wrong. The sport doesn't have room for the "bonehead" anymore. Fans who hanker for them to return need to move on.
ArthurClues wrote:Complete tosh. If you mean doesn't like idiotic thuggish play as evidenced by Pele the other night, you're right. If you mean players who compete, like Goudemand and McDonnell, you are wrong. The sport doesn't have room for the "bonehead" anymore. Fans who hanker for them to return need to move on.
Lprhino wrote:If we play the compare game (assuming Holroyd and McDonnell and gannon are fit and parcell doesn’t get a ban and hkr have everybody fit). They look like this
8. Sue 9. Litten 10. King 11. Hadley 12. Batchelor 13. Minichella
8. Mik 9. Ackers 10. Holroyd 11. McDonnell 12. Martin 13. Smith
14. O’Connor 15. Lisone 16. Sangare 17. Gannon
That is 10 players from a 17 and honestly I would pick possibly 2 out of that 10 from HKR over what we have.
So I just don’t get the comment. I think what you are trying to say (I will try and elucidate) is that you don’t like Smith, you don’t like his attitude, the way he sets his team up, the level of aggression he instills.
I will also go out in a limb and suggest you think we need bigger bodies, line bending props, big impact, rush défense and you want to see big hits and hard agressive play.
Sorry i think you have me mixed up with someone else , all i said was "i think H.K.R will be too strong for us in the Forwards "
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tex Rerp and 167 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
