Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13682 Location: West Yorkshire
Barrie’s Glass Eye wrote:I do think we’d have lost that game last year. That’s by far the biggest positive. Doesn’t by any means suggest I think things are hunky dory or we can rest on our laurels.
We’re ot going to get a clear picture on how we are going for a month or two imo. But what we do need to do is win games like last night when we aren’t playing to our potential, that makes a massive difference come the end of the year, as I say look at Wigan last year, they didn’t really start to shine until the second half of the season but they had won games playing poorly
ploinerrhino wrote:We are not strong enough in the forwards to win at H.K.R in my opinion
If we play the compare game (assuming Holroyd and McDonnell and gannon are fit and parcell doesn’t get a ban and hkr have everybody fit). They look like this
8. Sue 9. Litten 10. King 11. Hadley 12. Batchelor 13. Minichella
8. Mik 9. Ackers 10. Holroyd 11. McDonnell 12. Martin 13. Smith
14. O’Connor 15. Lisone 16. Sangare 17. Gannon
That is 10 players from a 17 and honestly I would pick possibly 2 out of that 10 from HKR over what we have.
So I just don’t get the comment. I think what you are trying to say (I will try and elucidate) is that you don’t like Smith, you don’t like his attitude, the way he sets his team up, the level of aggression he instills.
I will also go out in a limb and suggest you think we need bigger bodies, line bending props, big impact, rush défense and you want to see big hits and hard agressive play.
Lprhino wrote:If we play the compare game (assuming Holroyd and McDonnell and gannon are fit and parcell doesn’t get a ban and hkr have everybody fit). They look like this
8. Sue 9. Litten 10. King 11. Hadley 12. Batchelor 13. Minichella
8. Mik 9. Ackers 10. Holroyd 11. McDonnell 12. Martin 13. Smith
14. O’Connor 15. Lisone 16. Sangare 17. Gannon
That is 10 players from a 17 and honestly I would pick possibly 2 out of that 10 from HKR over what we have.
So I just don’t get the comment. I think what you are trying to say (I will try and elucidate) is that you don’t like Smith, you don’t like his attitude, the way he sets his team up, the level of aggression he instills.
I will also go out in a limb and suggest you think we need bigger bodies, line bending props, big impact, rush défense and you want to see big hits and hard agressive play.
Won't happen Smith doesn't like aggressive players.
Yep, that’s kind of the point I was making. It isn’t the players that he, or you, don’t like. It is the coach.
So whatever we do, however we play, there will always be faults and they will be picked up. There will always be an issue, we win then don’t like how we play, we don’t win then we don’t win. We win and play well, our defence isn’t good enough, we concede too much down the middle and we need more aggression.
RAPIDO wrote:Won't happen Smith doesn't like aggressive players.
Complete tosh. If you mean doesn't like idiotic thuggish play as evidenced by Pele the other night, you're right. If you mean players who compete, like Goudemand and McDonnell, you are wrong. The sport doesn't have room for the "bonehead" anymore. Fans who hanker for them to return need to move on.
christopher wrote:Disagree its a shoulder directly to the head, it’s a red card.
Same as micky macs in the cats game.
Similar to Mom last night for me, not a shoulder to the head but stepping across to shut the gap and cant get his arm wrapped around the ball carrier due to the supporting tackler. Hes made no play at the players head, very soft.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum