Look at the amount of defenders he attracts and he very rarely gets put on the ground creating a quick play the ball, he’s not a wrecking ball meter making type prop and never will be.

Looking at the stats (which don’t mean everything) our props were better in most areas than Salfords, we weren’t dominated in the prop area.

Salford played a great game plan (slowing the game down, messing about at the ruck) and Sneyd was on point with his in game kicking, but it wasn’t enough and Id say we wete way off our potential.

Hull KR are a totally different prospect with different capabilities, will be interesting to see how we go, I suspect it will be more free flowing which will actually suit us better than last night.

it should yes. early days. some good points some bad.
still look a bit light for me up front though

Sangare made more meters than any of Salfords props and he was the third most meters out of all our Props.

Oledski made double the meters than Salfords leading meter making prop.

Hard to judge KR given how dire FC were. I do think we have more to come but their place is never an easy place to go.

Miller, Roberts, Newman, Mom, Handley, Croft, Frawley, Mik, Ackers, Sangare, Goudemand, Martin, Smith: Lisone, Holroyd (!), O’Connor, Ruan.

:

It should be a good contest and it would be a great win.

Just saying it as I see it

Sangare made more metres last night than any Salford prop

I agree, the optimist in me says they don’t look as organized or clinical as last year but like I said too small a sample to judge them on.

Do the stats report minutes Christopher? I assume Sangare did less minutes than most.