Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13674 Location: West Yorkshire
Just regarding Bentley, we need to remember he hasn’t played for a long time, same with Mom, who I thought showed glimpses of what he’s going to bring to the side
christopher wrote:Just regarding Bentley, we need to remember he hasn’t played for a long time, same with Mom, who I thought showed glimpses of what he’s going to bring to the side
Agree Chris everybody quick to bag Bentley however he came on and played a long spell off the back of virtually no pre season. He was at fault for the try straight after coming on but after that I thought he tighten our defence around the edges. What is clear is that if the balance is to be correct realistically only one of Bentley McDonnell and Donaldson should be starting at one time. If all fit on form Mcdonnell probably gets first go.
Joined: Aug 09 2011 Posts: 1908 Location: Deepest North Yorkshire Woodland
christopher wrote:Could’ve at least wait until the first loss for the doom and gloom
I certainly don’t think it’s doom and gloom. Just people expressing views on the game. If we play well at rovers win or lose I will complement the team and the coach.
KaeruJim wrote:Once we get some key players back and find some form we’ll go okay.
Looking forward to seeing some of the younger players improve this year. I think we’ll look better on drier ground and faster tracks. Early rounds in Winter are often ropey.
not many key players to come back , in fact it is unlikely we will often put out stronger sides
Backwoodsman wrote:I certainly don’t think it’s doom and gloom. Just people expressing views on the game. If we play well at rovers win or lose I will complement the team and the coach.
We are not strong enough in the forwards to win at H.K.R in my opinion
Lprhino wrote:Find it best to sleep on things and re watch in the morning. Overall it was a difficult game, the ruck speed was a lot slower than Thursday and there were a lot of stoppages and it was a bit of a mess at times. I felt our discipline was a bit better, we made errors but overall it felt like less errors than at times last year. I can see the basis of the spine and how we want to play, still some concerns over our goal line defence. I know people are desperate for the rush up defence but I don’t ever see Smith playing that way (I also think if the game wants a quicker ruck that rush up defence stops most of the time). I don’t think Donaldson should be in the 17, unless we have significant injuries and no other option. I also think Bentley shouldn’t in near the 17 if everybody is fit. I actually like goudemond, lots of effort without being flashy. Everybody bags Sangare but from what I could see he needed 3-4 Salford players to tackle him every time he ran the ball and be sucked the juice out of them. He is a big boy and although he doesn’t ‘bend the line’ much he is difficult to stop and helps with winning the energy battle. I thought Frawley was nervous to start but got into the game and helped move us around, exactly what he is asked to do. Croft didn’t do much but was a threat. I think it will take some time to get that spine working cohesively, we do have a lot of players wanting the ball, will take some time. In conclusion, we won the game without being great. Players got some minutes and the spine got to play together. Salford had a plan to disrupt and slow it down, but we managed go get past it and we move on. If we win games without being great then I won’t complain that much.
ploinerrhino wrote:We are not strong enough in the forwards to win at H.K.R in my opinion
I'm reasonably optimistic we'll finish the stronger based on how each of us played. Though that could be down to rovers easing off once they'd seen off fc's lamentable effort.
"Look, I'd never use injuries as an excuse..." Daryl Powell
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
