Quote Itchy Arsenal="Itchy Arsenal"I don’t think that anyone has mentioned limited minutes yet? Apologies if someone has.
Using Harry Smith as a back example he cannot play more than 30 full games per year ie 2400 minutes per year.
Even assuming zero internationals, he won’t be able to play all possible games assuming we get to the CCF and GF.
What will the club do in 2025 when there is a planned tour of Australia? Assume that Smith will play 3 games in Australia and limit his game time for Wigan to 27 full games?
Could this be the end of internationals and/or the World Cup for English players?
Liam Farrell for example will be limited to 25 full games per year so I assume that he retire from international rugby as potentially most forwards will going forward.
Obviously this may lead to most teams having a “back” on the bench to reduce the number of 80 minutes games played but would say Leeming be “accepted” as back substitute for game A if he replaces Smith but a forward substitute if he say replaces O’Neil?
If player welfare is now paramount then why continue with meaningless loop fixtures and the even more preposterous Magic Weekend?
Obviously Jon questions not just aimed at yourself.'"
Internationals and finals can be used in credit I believe as they cannot be planned for. However they have to be accounted for in the following season.
I anticipate in certain games squads will be rotated which again is why I see Rocky as a key signing.
Having versatility is essential under this new protocol.
You would expect most players to be unavailable for a couple of games a year minimum due to injury and I think we will manage the process depending on opposition.
I think with our squad depth it’s less of an issue given the quality of depth we have, some clubs may really struggle though with thinner squads.
London, Cas and Salford in particular look to have very thin squads.