I agree

Looks totally lost at times at 10 does Piroe. Rutter is much much better playing a bit deeper..

I think farke is still learning about his players and the team is a work in progress. wouldn't shock me if rutter and piroes roles changed

The thing is, Piroe's all round game has never been the best. He's a great ball striker and finisher, but he doesn't stretch a back line, he doesn't link play, and he doesn't press high. He's in the 10 because he can't press high, and being a bit deeper means he, in theory, can get more opportunities to strike from distance, which is one of his strengths. Moving him to 9 may be more effective, but the front line is so fluid, i doubt we'd notice any difference beyond where they're named on the team sheet.

fair points

I do wonder if the we will bring in a good 10 in Jan. could be the final piece to give us a major push

Makes sense JB

Couple of downsides to that is one Byram is a RB and two he is very injury prone.
Compare the assists from Davis to Byram and Davis is miles ahead.
But as it stands Byram is doing a great job there.

Judging by his press conference, Farke read my post.

Thats a great lengthy answer on Piroe from Farke, and I'd say hes right in everything he says.