Average Super league attendances with one round left
1 Wigan 14454
2 Leeds 13510
3 Hull FC 13291
4 Saints 12384
5 Warrington 11467
6 Catalans 8831
7 Hull KR 8784
8 Castleford 7933
9 Leigh 7270
10 Huddersfield 5397
11 Salford 4699
12 Wakefield 4411

Not a bad average for Cas with the poor season we had and all earns points towards franchises.

Another point every team saw an increase in attendance apart from Wakefield which saw a drop which they put down to the stand been rebuilt. Also the highest superleague attendance in 2023 was Hull FC v Castleford which attracted a crowd of over 15000.

Leighs will be over 7500 after Friday Nights sellout which isn't bad considering its our first season back and ticket prices etc.....

Yes - great first year back in SL for Leigh. Well done on attendances. I recon you will be up to 8000 to 8500 next year with this year’s momentum.

What rubbish is this?

4 games had a higher attendance than that one.

Wigan 14-6 St Helens, 24,275
Hull FC 0-40 Hull KR, 20,985
St Helens 34-16 Wigan, 17,088
Leeds 18-22 Hull FC, 16,140
Hull FC 32-30 Castleford, 15,383

Tigerade wrote:Average Super league attendances with one round left 1 Wigan 14454 2 Leeds 13510 3 Hull FC 13291 4 Saints 12384 5 Warrington 11467 6 Catalans 8831 7 Hull KR 8784 8 Castleford 7933 9 Leigh 7270 10 Huddersfield 5397 11 Salford 4699 12 Wakefield 4411 These figures are incorrect too so your entire post is drivel. They come from this article which was about the averages after 11 rounds had been played - https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/su ... nce-so-far

Tigerade wrote:Average Super league attendances with one round left 1 Wigan 14454 2 Leeds 13510 3 Hull FC 13291 4 Saints 12384 5 Warrington 11467 6 Catalans 8831 7 Hull KR 8784 8 Castleford 7933 9 Leigh 7270 10 Huddersfield 5397 11 Salford 4699 12 Wakefield 4411 These figures are incorrect too so your entire post is drivel. They come from this article which was about the averages after 11 rounds had been played - https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/su ... nce-so-far

MjM wrote:These figures are incorrect too so your entire post is drivel. They come from this article which was about the averages after 11 rounds had been played - https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/su ... nce-so-far .. So forgetting the opening post here are the final figures. https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ra ... nty-broken

MjM wrote:These figures are incorrect too so your entire post is drivel. They come from this article which was about the averages after 11 rounds had been played - https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/su ... nce-so-far .. So forgetting the opening post here are the final figures. https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ra ... nty-broken

Hull Kr. Highest unknown. Lowest unknown.

Lol

Anyone know the reasoning behind Hull KR's secrecy? And how are they getting away with it?

Because their crowds are no where near as good as hull kr have reported to the RFL?