Let’s see if we are back in business or still in the same place as prior to the break. Tough game for Rohan Smith this one, good news with Newman and Fusitua being back, bad news is Sangare gone for the season.
Handley Fusitua Newman Martin MacDonald Sinfield Sezer Oledzki O’Connor Holroyd McDonnell Bentley Smith
Frosties. wrote:Let’s see if we are back in business or still in the same place as prior to the break. Tough game for Rohan Smith this one, good news with Newman and Fusitua being back, bad news is Sangare gone for the season.
Handley Fusitua Newman Martin MacDonald Sinfield Sezer Oledzki O’Connor Holroyd McDonnell Bentley Smith
Frosties. wrote:Let’s see if we are back in business or still in the same place as prior to the break. Tough game for Rohan Smith this one, good news with Newman and Fusitua being back, bad news is Sangare gone for the season.
Handley Fusitua Newman Martin MacDonald Sinfield Sezer Oledzki O’Connor Holroyd McDonnell Bentley Smith
Johnson Lisone Walters Donaldson
Hooley, Ruan, Roberts, Tindall.
Fully expect something like this…
Oledski has been poor to the point of im thinking he doesn't want to perform,so I'd start with our best front row Holroyd Johnson Walters.
Frosties. wrote:Let’s see if we are back in business or still in the same place as prior to the break. Tough game for Rohan Smith this one, good news with Newman and Fusitua being back, bad news is Sangare gone for the season.
Handley Fusitua Newman Martin MacDonald Sinfield Sezer Oledzki O’Connor Holroyd McDonnell Bentley Smith
Johnson Lisone Walters Donaldson
Hooley, Ruan, Roberts, Tindall.
Fully expect something like this…
If the plan is to start Newman, I'd stick with Hooley at full back and move Martin back to the second row and have either McDonnell or Bentley on the bench. Sinfield in the halves would be a bold move but I suspect he might go with Johnson.
ArthurClues wrote:If the plan is to start Newman, I'd stick with Hooley at full back and move Martin back to the second row and have either McDonnell or Bentley on the bench. Sinfield in the halves would be a bold move but I suspect he might go with Johnson.
Really not sure Sinfield rated that highly. To be picking Johnson there ( who offers nothing) is a bit of an insult….
Shabino wrote:Really not sure Sinfield rated that highly. To be picking Johnson there ( who offers nothing) is a bit of an insult….
He's only 18 though, Shabs. I think he is highly rated, but the worry would be that Wire would send a lot of traffic at him. For what it's worth, I would pick him.
ArthurClues wrote:He's only 18 though, Shabs. I think he is highly rated, but the worry would be that Wire would send a lot of traffic at him. For what it's worth, I would pick him.
But surely it’s time to see what can offer. Might not be fully ready, but not many are when thrown into deep end. Genuine half back at least, and not as if we are paying well in the halves….
Shabino wrote:But surely it’s time to see what can offer. Might not be fully ready, but not many are when thrown into deep end. Genuine half back at least, and not as if we are paying well in the halves….
RAPIDO wrote:Oledski has been poor to the point of im thinking he doesn't want to perform,so I'd start with our best front row Holroyd Johnson Walters.
You can't say that on here Oldeski is a protected species.
Users browsing this forum: tad rhino and 64 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum