Joined: Jul 17 2015 Posts: 4716 Location: Sitting on the naughty step
I don’t know what happened over night but I have woken up brim full of optimism! Of course it may just be that we don’t have a game this weekend but I don’t think so. C’mon the WIRE!!!!
Just my opinions unless it's a FACT, in which case it's a fact.
Joined: Jul 06 2009 Posts: 9683 Location: Somewhere under the salary cap
WireWireWire wrote:Once again, its not my job to figure that out. It doesn't mean I can't have a negative opinion on a decision made, based on the facts at hand. Which is - Burgess' personal success never did anything for those around him, because aside from 1 solitary year, all Souths were, were nearly men. We've had that ad nauseum.
you're the one brining his playing career into it.. saying he isn't a winner.
It just makes you look a bit silly tbh.
Sure, you can question the appointment, but referring back to his playing career as a yardstick? come on now.
Joined: Jul 06 2009 Posts: 9683 Location: Somewhere under the salary cap
WireWireWire wrote:Once again, its not my job to figure that out. It doesn't mean I can't have a negative opinion on a decision made, based on the facts at hand. Which is - Burgess' personal success never did anything for those around him, because aside from 1 solitary year, all Souths were, were nearly men. We've had that ad nauseum.
you're the one brining his playing career into it.. saying he isn't a winner.
It just makes you look a bit silly tbh.
Sure, you can question the appointment, but referring back to his playing career as a yardstick? come on now.
morleys_deckchair wrote:you're the one brining his playing career into it.. saying he isn't a winner.
It just makes you look a bit silly tbh.
Sure, you can question the appointment, but referring back to his playing career as a yardstick? come on now.
You called him a born winner. By saying that, YOU brought his playing career into it. I was just saying that if he couldn't get the rest of his playing mates to perform to a trophy winning standard consistently, then why believe he would as a coach.
Joined: Apr 09 2010 Posts: 14979 Location: The Moon
WireWireWire wrote:You called him a born winner. By saying that, YOU brought his playing career into it. I was just saying that if he couldn't get the rest of his playing mates to perform to a trophy winning standard consistently, then why believe he would as a coach.
karetaker wrote:Still no news on the other assistant then.
Not heard any rumours, though i would like us to Keep Gleeson on for longer than just this year. He's massively experienced and hopefully can sharpen our attack and take us up a gear.
Or thane wrote:Not heard any rumours, though i would like us to Keep Gleeson on for longer than just this year. He's massively experienced and hopefully can sharpen our attack and take us up a gear.
Think I read somewhere he had something sorted in France for next year? He seems to favour RU.
Doesn't Gleeson have a job coaching USA RU next year? That's how I understood it. Maybe we can tempt him out of it if things go well with the attacking structure.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
