batleyrhino wrote:I’d also put most of it on the players, they are individually responsible for it. Collectively, and over time, it’s the coach that is responsible as he sets the acceptable standards and has to get players to perform or they are replaced. Smith is far from solely to blame, but he’s not without blame either.
And he got those standard against Wire and Hudds, and I’m sure he won’t be happy that they dropped the standards last night.
Who do you replace them with tho? Donaldson? Academy players? Are they ready to step up? We don’t seem to have much strength in depth
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 9576 Location: anywhere, literally...
leedsbarmyarmy wrote:And he got those standard against Wire and Hudds, and I’m sure he won’t be happy that they dropped the standards last night.
Who do you replace them with tho? Donaldson? Academy players? Are they ready to step up? We don’t seem to have much strength in depth
The “they’re not ready” line is a bit of a nonsense to me. No player who has debuted has ever been ready, they will make mistakes but will develop faster with first team exposure than without. Perhaps more importantly it’s critical to signal to those who under perform that they don’t have any pressure on them. Can you imagine if a senior player is serially underperforming and is replaced for a game or two by a kid, is there a better way to kick them up the butt and let everyone know that they haven’t been achieving the required levels?
It's not how much talent you've got, it's what you do with it that counts.
batleyrhino wrote:The “they’re not ready” line is a bit of a nonsense to me. No player who has debuted has ever been ready, they will make mistakes but will develop faster with first team exposure than without. Perhaps more importantly it’s critical to signal to those who under perform that they don’t have any pressure on them. Can you imagine if a senior player is serially underperforming and is replaced for a game or two by a kid, is there a better way to kick them up the butt and let everyone know that they haven’t been achieving the required levels?
Throwing in kids isn’t always the best option tho, especially in the forwards, I know nothing about the academy team and who the next in line would be but chucking in a 17 year old prop just because he’s next in line who’s never played against grown men is irresponsible and can do a lot more harm than good.
I agree players should be dropped if constantly under performing
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 9576 Location: anywhere, literally...
We’re pretty much in agreement there, you need to handle kids carefully, but a week or two in the front line can be worth months in the Academy, as long as they can take it physically.
It's not how much talent you've got, it's what you do with it that counts.
Joined: Aug 02 2002 Posts: 7299 Location: Wakefield but near to Leeds!
Second game running O`Connor has had a bad day at the office. I might be wrong but I do think we are flogging him too hard and getting him to play too many minutes. Maybe the guy needs a break to recharge? Likewise Smith has played well for the majority of games this season. But because the halves fail to take control of the game again imo Smith might just feel he has to do the controlling and ends up stifling the play. Our forwards were nowhere near as intent as Lees was for Saints last night. We are very powder puff in the collision.
batleyrhino wrote:TlCan you imagine if a senior player is serially underperforming and is replaced for a game or two by a kid, is there a better way to kick them up the butt and let everyone know that they haven’t been achieving the required levels?
Kicking up the butt isn't the Leeds way these days. Can you imagine the sparks that would have flown in a dressing room containing JP, kev, Danny Mags if they'd been playing how we have this year? Or saints? Incoming signings must wonder what they've walked into these days. Still, at least we bring through some well mannered young men.
"Look, I'd never use injuries as an excuse..." Daryl Powell
Joined: Oct 09 2004 Posts: 15864 Location: Nottingham. 800 years ago outlaws stole from the rich. Little has changed here
Issues for me are: We lack x factor. Our one exciting option is injured 50% of the time We are the best resources club in the country. Somehow we can't utilise that in the squad. Our halfbacks are at best inconsistent. Austin was on fire a couple of weeks ago, and awful this week. Sezer as the organiser is invisible almost every week. Myler is solid but no xfactor. Most teams most impactful player these days is the fullback
As a club we always do our announcements late in the season, and with most of our business done behind closed doors, when times are tough it looks like we don't have a plan. Sometimes it's because we don't, sometimes it just hasn't been announced.
I think it was mentioned earlier, as a club we don't seem desperate for success. That may not be true on the inside, but I agree as an outsider
Joined: Oct 09 2004 Posts: 15864 Location: Nottingham. 800 years ago outlaws stole from the rich. Little has changed here
Additionally, most accept that our best time as a club recently was based in solid home grown players and complemented with some seasoned pros. That model doesn't happen overnight. It takes time. I believe that Rohan Smith is here for a long-term overhaul. He's needed to do some surgery in the short term to steady the ship and put foundations in place for us to be strong long term. Growing pains for the likes of Newman, O'Connor and Gannon will happen. Players like Walters will always happen. Some clubs will be willing to pay more for some players than others.
The club may be heading in the right direction long term, and that it's just the results are a lagging indicator of that.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum