Fantastic Mr Catpiss wrote:i said similar about the tetavano tackle, i've sympathy with that one, players just can't change the laws of physics
Saw the Tetavano one last night,it's bloody ridiculous. He's set to make the tackle when the ball runner still has the ball,less than 1m from the ball carrier ( who is still running ) like you say there is no way that can change,there simply isn't the time or the space to change it. They need to realize that when a smaller player runs into a bigger one then the smaller player is going to get put on his booty.
brook40 wrote:Saw the Tetavano one last night,it's bloody ridiculous. He's set to make the tackle when the ball runner still has the ball,less than 1m from the ball carrier ( who is still running ) like you say there is no way that can change,there simply isn't the time or the space to change it. They need to realize that when a smaller player runs into a bigger one then the smaller player is going to get put on his booty.
Tetavano was charged for a high tackle, Sironen for late contact on the passer.
I think the Sironen one was harsh but Tetevano drove his shoulder into Smith's face.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 4250 Location: Its in the name
Redvee is very funny.... everything viewed through red n white tinted glasses...everyone is against them...everything is unfair...and basically their players should be free to do whatever they like in a game with total impunity. Lees is one of the biggest cheap shot merchants in the league at the moment...and yet the Stains can't see what everyone else sees. lol.
Joined: Sep 20 2005 Posts: 1097 Location: The Yard
Oxford Exile wrote:Lees is one of the biggest cheap shot merchants in the league at the moment...and yet the Stains can't see what everyone else sees. lol.
Lees has now had 11 different incidents referred to the disciplinary this season. Three for dangerous contact, three for high tackles, two for striking off the ball, one for head-butting, one for late contact, one for obstructing a runner. Total consequences - a two-match ban, a caution and a £250 fine. Whereas saying an inappropriate word gets you seven matches. Good system?
Joined: Feb 07 2005 Posts: 8642 Location: Home sweet home
The Speculator wrote:Lees has now had 11 different incidents referred to the disciplinary this season. Three for dangerous contact, three for high tackles, two for striking off the ball, one for head-butting, one for late contact, one for obstructing a runner. Total consequences - a two-match ban, a caution and a £250 fine. Whereas saying an inappropriate word gets you seven matches. Good system?
Yeh but lees is being picked on by the rfl...funny how it seems to be the same saints players nearly every week...
Users browsing this forum: Paddywire and 221 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Why are we going into meltdown, unless we kick off and start shouting you can’t use one of the games against Halifax 
