Though there are obvious issues with the squad, the players that are there are better quality than we are seeing. Constantly doing hard work coming away from your own line is lowering their quality in attack. If we had a shaun wane type coach I recon we would've won significantly more matches this year. Maybe we need to invest in a dedicated defense coach
Smith asserts that we've been in all the games this year and the majority could have gone either way. I'm not sure how he can say this is true as we never looked like beating leigh, KR, Salford and especially Warrington.
Seth wrote:Smith asserts that we've been in all the games this year and the majority could have gone either way. I'm not sure how he can say this is true as we never looked like beating leigh, KR, Salford and especially Warrington.
I don't know whether he means this or not, or whether he's trying to shield the players.
He's clearly an unorthodox coach, which may be in part how we got to the GF last year where he clearly got us playing as a team, which Agar couldn't do. I wish he would just come out and tell us what he is actually aiming for in performance, but the RL journos don't seem to press him on tactics enough. If he genuinely thinks we've played well in attack, what is he marking that against other than 'togetherness' which isn't exactly measurable. If he would give some indication as to what he's aiming for, at least we'd have an idea of how he's trying to play, as at the moment I've no idea!
As others have said though, this is a re-build and I'm sure many very senior high paid players have been told that they are not being offered new deals. That's not a great recipe for getting a team to but into what he's doing.
I think give us more transparency and a road map of where he sees this team going and more of us will get behind him. That's if he knows...
exiledrhino wrote:I don't know whether he means this or not, or whether he's trying to shield the players.
He's clearly an unorthodox coach, which may be in part how we got to the GF last year where he clearly got us playing as a team, which Agar couldn't do. I wish he would just come out and tell us what he is actually aiming for in performance, but the RL journos don't seem to press him on tactics enough. If he genuinely thinks we've played well in attack, what is he marking that against other than 'togetherness' which isn't exactly measurable. If he would give some indication as to what he's aiming for, at least we'd have an idea of how he's trying to play, as at the moment I've no idea!
As others have said though, this is a re-build and I'm sure many very senior high paid players have been told that they are not being offered new deals. That's not a great recipe for getting a team to but into what he's doing.
I think give us more transparency and a road map of where he sees this team going and more of us will get behind him. That's if he knows...
Yep, good point and could be a factor behind recent performances. I don't like the way that works is RL. You end up with loads of players knowing that they playing elsewhere next season and it's only May.
Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13622 Location: West Yorkshire
Trebor1 wrote:Yep, good point and could be a factor behind recent performances. I don't like the way that works is RL. You end up with loads of players knowing that they playing elsewhere next season and it's only May.
If that was the case they would be on the RFL recent player list as not offered a deal I think? (I could be wrong)
Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13622 Location: West Yorkshire
Seth wrote:Smith asserts that we've been in all the games this year and the majority could have gone either way. I'm not sure how he can say this is true as we never looked like beating leigh, KR, Salford and especially Warrington.
I wouldn't read too much into the pressers, its very rare a coach will come out and berate the players, he has said on multiple occasions that as a team we are nowhere near we should be but still has the belief that we can be, that's pretty standard for a coach to say in pressers, he's not daft.
I think the point he is making is that bar Warrington, we haven't been hammered, which we haven't, we've always been within one or two scores, I'm not saying that's good enough, it isn't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum