Beaujangles wrote:Springer,King,Doro Arundel all falling foul of the 'requirements'.Won't repeat what Arundel put on facebook..Gwaze didnt stay-I know you'll come back with finance but his 15/25 minute replacement man who makes Anthony Seuseu look origin standard-i'd pay the difference in contract myself..
Springer and Arundel may loosely fit the awkward description but Gwaze and King left for different reasons and since the Gwaze negotiations went on for months why didn’t you make your contract payment offer when you had the chance?
By the way it’s well known in every work place environment once you pay 1 player / person more you open up the prospect of having to pay everyone more or causing internal division if you don’t.
(You have hit on what’s holding us back though and it’s finances and not the coach.)
Springer and Arundel’s departures were seasons apart, Gwaze was brought in by Grix so he got that one right and he left for a better deal and Doro is still here so the 3/4 is clearly not in line with the facts and is unfairly loaded negatively against Grix.
The facts are under SG after the regular games in the last two seasons Fax have finished third both times with only the likes of Leigh, Fev and Toulouse finishing above them all of whom had much bigger budgets which was acknowledged by the wider rugby league fraternity Grix having a high level of performance vs resource ratio.
Who would you replace him with that you could guarantee something better with the same situation?
