He was impressive and eye catching going forward.
And showed some decent aggression.
But desperately needs more fitness.
12 mins in first half and 8 mins in second half is nowhere near enough.

Fair points. Think Hunswick and Smith will definitely be after more game time. But in fairness, I can't say Oledzki made a telling contribution to the game in comparison.

Depends what youre looking at sangares 3 telling carries or Oledzkis higher workload on and off the ball, I think Mik carried well to be honest and his numbers will be far ahead of sangares. Given the choice of the 2, I'd be taking Oledzkis contribution

Yep, I probably take Oledzki's level of consistency for granted. Just think that Sangare, if properly developed, has a bit of x factor about him.

Putting them in the same side seems a winner then?

If sangare can up his workload and manage at least 15 minutes a half. He made a big impact with a couple of carries, France went within 6 then he came off, he should have been a major part in France building on that going to half time and for the opening of the second half. There's either not enough trust due to defensive vulnerabilities or he just physically cant manage more minutes.

where are you getting that from? came on 17 minutes, went off 32 = 15 minutes
for an impact prop off our bench i dont think 15 minutes would be a bad stint

My mistake then if I've done him out of 3 minutes. Anyone know how many carries and tackles he made in for his 23 minutes on the field?

think i read he made about 90 metres and didnt miss a tackle, no idea on the other ones
not sure why youre so bothered about him not coming on earlier in the second half, its not like he can sub himself on

I'm bothered that the coaching team for whatever reason used him for very limited minutes, from what I've seen I'm not convinced on his overall game.