mwindass wrote:It just doesn't make sense. It was ban enough for the ref to sin bin him at the time.
MRP found him guilty and gave him 2 matches
Upheld the ban after an appeal
Now he's free to play after a second appeal.
What's changed?
The amount inside the brown envelope handed over.
This is why the RFL and Disciplinary panel rightly get criticised as there is a total lack of consistency in the decisions and total lack of transparency. Its also ridiculous that international games would count against a players ban.
Clubs are struggling as it is to keep fans but when the sport itself does things like this it just makes a totally mockery of fairness and turns fans away in numbers. As much as I dislike Leeds they have been shafted well and truly by the RFL when they appealed Martins ban which was even for me excessive, yet Knowles makes a clear intent to twist a players arm and is rightly carded (though it should in all honesty been a red) then gets a ban, appeal is turned down but not declared frivolous yet St's appeal again and as is by magic Knowles is left off. Crooked is an understatement. where is the integrity within the RFL as it is very much lacking.