Post subject: Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford)
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:51 am
ArthurClues
Club Captain
Joined: Jan 24 2020 Posts: 2658
Jack Burton wrote:Sezer and Gannon definitely out with concussion
Think Sezer was pretty inevitable from the moment he went down. Massively impressed with Rohan on Gannon. Sounds like technically he could play, but they are not willing to risk his health. Sounds very much like Martin is the only returnee. So be it.
Post subject: Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford)
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:03 pm
rollin thunder
International Star
Joined: Feb 15 2011 Posts: 4940
It would be shocking for if knowles and welbsly are allowed to play, especially Welbsly given we have a player out due to concussion protocol after foul play, direct hit to the head. But the MRP and RFL don’t follow their own rules.
Post subject: Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford)
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:31 pm
exiledrhino
Club Captain
Joined: Apr 04 2019 Posts: 428
I suspect Knowles will be ok, because they are mainly concerned about concussions at the minute.
In any case, let them both play. Lets have both teams as close to full strength as possible, and battle it out for top spot. I think Rohan is putting huge emphasis that it doesn’t matter who is not playing or what the other team are doing, only what we can control.
Let saints bring it on with a full contingent and let the best team win!
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
christopher wrote:So should Welsby
Don't agree with - it was a great tackle - if we are banning players for tackles like that they game is ruined as a spectacle
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Sal Paradise wrote:Don't agree with - it was a great tackle - if we are banning players for tackles like that they game is ruined as a spectacle
It was a great tackle apart from the fact that he clocked him in the face with his shoulder. If he was six inches lower you'd be right, but you can't ban all headshots "apart from the ones that look great"
Post subject: Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford)
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Sal Paradise
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
This is a game - Leeds should go into with confidence. Saints are beatable it needs a strong ref who will keep an eye on the offside at the PTB - Saints are too quick off the mark.
As Salford showed Saints right side is vulnerable. If Knowles plays then something is seriously wrong with the MRP.
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
Big Jim Slade wrote:It was a great tackle apart from the fact that he clocked him in the face with his shoulder. If he was six inches lower you'd be right, but you can't ban all headshots "apart from the ones that look great"
I dont agree he has simply flatten him head on - no sure what he supposed to do? Props just run over smaller guys no problem they drive in with their shoulder straight at an opponents head - that's OK?
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Post subject: Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford)
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:58 pm
batleyrhino
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 9576 Location: anywhere, literally...
Sal Paradise wrote:This is a game - Leeds should go into with confidence. Saints are beatable it needs a strong ref who will keep an eye on the offside at the PTB - Saints are too quick off the mark.
As Salford showed Saints right side is vulnerable. If Knowles plays then something is seriously wrong with the MRP.
If Saints are off the line a bit quick, then chip over them. We have a coach now who would encourage that kind of play I think, and do it once or twice and they will either take a defender form the line (leaving more from) to sweep behind or give us a second more to get forwards.
We need to play our game on Saturday, not be forced into the one they want to play.
It's not how much talent you've got, it's what you do with it that counts.
Sal Paradise wrote:I dont agree he has simply flatten him head on - no sure what he supposed to do? Props just run over smaller guys no problem they drive in with their shoulder straight at an opponents head - that's OK?
For me that's shoulder to head contact either first or simultaneously, clear foul play. It's no different to a swinging arm - most high shots are unintended, but that's really neither here nor there is it? What he's supposed to do is go lower, get the shoulder anywhere but into his head. It's not like it's a new rule.
As for the props carrying the ball argument, I don't know, but it's a completely separate issue.
Joined: Aug 24 2006 Posts: 5214 Location: Another dimension
Big Jim Slade wrote:
For me that's shoulder to head contact either first or simultaneously, clear foul play. It's no different to a swinging arm - most high shots are unintended, but that's really neither here nor there is it? What he's supposed to do is go lower, get the shoulder anywhere but into his head. It's not like it's a new rule.
As for the props carrying the ball argument, I don't know, but it's a completely separate issue.
Sorry the picture you grabbed shows shoulder on shoulder contact?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum