Seth wrote:What a fuc king joke. Surely they could put those 2 incidents together in an appeal.
The club tried the approach of comparing other incidents when appealing the Newman ban. The panel agreed and said those incidents should also have received bans.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
and risk RFL giving another frivolous ban? they probably think whats the point
There is a difference. Martin makes modest contact with a player who has just passed the ball. The Salford player makes contact on a player who never received the ball. If anything the Salford “foul” is worse IMO but agree both incidents are nothing.
and risk RFL giving another frivolous ban? they probably think whats the point
There is a difference. Martin makes modest contact with a player who has just passed the ball. The Salford player makes contact on a player who never received the ball. If anything the Salford “foul” is worse IMO but agree both incidents are nothing.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
