So Dean Hadley has had his ban reversed on appeal.

Just had a look at the MRP notes and Hadley has 5 charges against him during our match. 4 for a late hit on the kicker and 1 for a late hit on the passer?

Luckily for him they deem the footage inconclusive on a couple of the hits?

The wording on Connor Wynne charge is exactly the same as the one Hadley has had reversed. Should we have appealed?

Glad AP has finally spoken out about the disciplinary process but doubt anything will change despite it being very suspect.

The appeal system seems an absolute lottery. Mata'utia and Hadleys ban got scratched off. Leeds appealed Priors ban which stayed at 2 games...

I think some of it comes down to prior convictions too.

With the Cas game on the horizon its probably better to take our punishment this week without making things worse.

It'll be interesting to see the outcome of the 2nd Newman appeal today.

Agree with you, will be targeting the Cas game. Him, Sao, Evans, Mau and maybe Connor back with give us a strong squad.

Just watched the game back on TV the commentary and punditry was absolutely horrendous, I couldn't believe the bias from the commentary team, especially Kyle Amor filling his sock everytime Rovers scored, didn't even bother speaking when hull did, so much for impartiality.

I thought that as well. I like Amor as a commentator but he seemed to be leaning towards Rovers. Plus he came out with the "take a bow" which I find irritating.

Jones-Buchanan was hoping that his mate McGuire won it for Rovers and Wilkin well we don't need to go there.

The conundrum for me MB is Wells, what’s his love affair with our neighbour's about.

He keeps referring to them as the most entertaining team in SL. Tommy Cooper was an entertainer. Maybe he's got a point.

The Sky love in with the Dobbins is hard to fathom (Wilkins apart).

Fall over themselves to dish the praise out. Even keep banging on about the burger and kebab vans they have on the South Stand wasteland.