I didnt delete anything it was done for me,thanks for your concern.

Stains are the bench mark everyone agrees,but you always jump on Wigan with relish and cannot stop your self from insulting anything to do with wigan.
Why bring Willie into this as this was about last friday with Stains being cited more than Wigan accept it your players were the biggest culprits in this game.

Stains have had more players banned this season so far than Wigan so you could be on the way to being a grubby outfit.

From the game between Leeds and hudds, Leeds had 6 players cited, hudds had zero.
Of Those 4/6 were for late hits on The the passer / kicker, (incidentally all on the same player)……… so clearly Leeds had a less than squeaky clean game plan to hit fages, it was more than obvious during the game- he didn’t remain on his feet once after kicking at the end of a set. This in itself should result in some sort of club warning, if as the RFL keep saying we are all about protecting players. That’s what Leeds have now resorted to in desperation to get a point.

If they only did late hits on your kicker then yes the team needs a warning, really obvious dont you think.

reminds of the time stains players went for the standing leg of the player,thankfully that stopped.

Well he’s not playing Monday so looks like their tactics definitely had an impact. I would imagine if he could he would be playing against his old club.

Hope you win

There is absolutely no other reason to do what he did, other than to cause serious injury.

That’s the reason those tackles are banned

Well Hurrell got a ban did the a crusher tackle is it because he intended to cause serious injury.
Thats the reason those tackles are banned

Believe what you want but you still can't prove intent.

Big difference between the Hurrell one and the Powell one, the Hurrell one didn't really show intent and left space for head movement thats why he only got a 2 match ban.

The Powell one was horrendouson on Bennison, he was already tackled around the legs and Powell just needed to lay on to slow the ruck. Instead he picked him up and then slammed him down almost snapping his neck, his only defence will be a brain fart but the disciplinary will probably judge it very serious and a 6 match ban minimum.

Some of the Wigoon fans are saying he deserves an 8 match ban.

I dont think you understand as your hatred is corrupting your brain,

They both were crusher tackles one far worse than the other and will get dealt as it should be upto 8 matches I agree with.
So as the other one deserved a 2 match ban obviously he was not trying to break his neck you and your demented stain fans would have us believe the other one would mean he was trying to injure him just maybe miss a few matches to use the same analogy.

Dont you get it we are in agreement about the severity of the ban.