Why not?

For me he doesn't have the dynamic impact that would would like from someone coming on from the bench.

I am not saying it is inconceivable but I agree he is a better option as starting prop. Ideally Havard joins Mago on the bench and we should see a rea change in the game if we can get that rotation functioning and fit.

I think there's an element of if you want a quick start and early domination or a settled and controlled start with impact off the bench. We have opted for the latter and, so far at least, it seems to be working for us. It's interesting to note that Saints start with their most destructive prop and look to get dominance early. I think we could adopt the same style once a fit and firing Havard returns. I'm not sure we have enough big yardage or destructive props to do that at the moment.

Apologies for the stupid question but is Harry Smith unfit or down the pecking order?

Down the pecking order at the moment but I think it's safe to say Leuluai won't be playing every game this season so I'd imagine he'll be back in sooner rather than later

He is where he should have been last season in that he will play a handful of games that we should win and where he can just play his game.

Unfortunately he ended up playing all last season behind a pack that got stuffed.

The big one for him will be what we choose to do with a fit French and Field as one may move to the halves which would move him down the order again.

I’d probably just consider splitting what looks to be two more impactful props on the bench and go Ellis and Byrne and Singleton and Mago in pairs. One reason for that would be that I always think you should earn a start and look to push people by offering that carrot. I think Byrne did that last week and Singleton not so much. I also think Singleton playing off the bench with Mago could help him. If you’ve got that impact Mago is bringing, you’ve got good go forward and good attacking options and then just to have a steady player like Singleton at the side of him (low errors, good defender, good talker etc) makes sense to me.

I absolutely agree on Havard by the way, bar maybe he’s a man to start with Ellis if you want a couple of long spells and then Byrne takes a bench spot again with Mago. The long and short is that Singleton will need to produce more than these first two weeks to hold a spot in the 17.

Because he doesn’t work as an impact player.

What's the call if we go four forwards on the bench when Havards back?
Start with Ellis Havard, ..bench ..Mago Smithies, Byrne and Singleton.
Obviously when French is back and fully fit do we go Cust 7, Field at 6, and carry an extra 9 in Tommy off the bench? Also that does give the option of playing Powell Tommy Cust then run Field and French like two full backs. If you could do that with Mago Bateman and KPP off-load games it would be hard to defend.
Whatever they decide that leaves plenty lads pushing outside the 17 Miski Thornley Partington Shorrocks looks so much stronger now.

When was the last time Tommy played 9? 2019?

I don’t think he has the engine to defend in the middle anymore.

We’ve gone with Shorrocks and Hastings at 9 in the last few years rather than Tommy going there.