Donnyman wrote:We can fund the current model because the rich club owners have very kindly put more into the game, especially a host of Championship club owners that are queuing up to try to get promotion to Superleague in what will be a very exciting Championship
Leigh or Featherstone......last year was Toulouse of Featherstone......time before was Toronto of Featherstone......the other 12 clubs won't be close. Owners of Championship clubs, Derek the deck boy aside, put in enough to keep the lights on......superleague would cripple most of them.
Donnyman wrote:The SL chairmen have chased other deals and outlets to show our games and have had success there, but hey let's not give credit where credit is due.
Superleague games on FTA was a no.brqiner and should have been written into broadcast rights 2 decades ago.
Donnyman wrote:We can just make ourselves on here sound superior to them by slagging them off
I'll applaud them when they do something cutting edge that's not designed to circle the wagons....
Donnyman wrote:Next season is looking good for the Superleague and the Championship which ultimately is Superleague 2.
If you want to compare Leeds v Wigan to Batley v Whitehaven by all means go ahead, but I'll stick with the top tier and the second tier...neither which are very super at present.
Donnyman wrote: As for League one, that will be where the real struggle will be.......
On that we can agree. What the top teams fail to realise is that we aren't football....there isn't the depth of support for the game at grass roots and without central funding, the game will contract further.